Effect of PDCA circulation method applied in operation room management on the implementation rate of hand hygiene and nursing quality of personnel
-
摘要:
目的 探讨PDCA循环法用于手术室管理对人员手卫生执行率及护理质量的影响。 方法选取2014年5月~2015年6月我院10个重点手术科室120例医护人员为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组和对照组各60例,其中对照组行常规手术室管理,观察组在此基础上采用PDCA循环法对手术室进行管理,比较两组人员手卫生执行率、手卫生知晓率,手术不良事件发生率及两组患者护理满意度。 结果干预后观察组手卫生执行率83.3%、手卫生知晓率81.7%与对照组66.7%、65.0%比较显著较高(P<0.05);观察组手术不良事件发生率23.3%明显低于对照组40.0%(P<0.05);观察组客户护理满意率88.3%明显高于对照组73.3%(P<0.05)。 结论PDCA循环法用于手术室管理可有效提高人员手卫生执行率、知晓率,并改善护理质量,值得在临床广泛推广。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of PDCA circulation method applied in operation room management on the implementation rate of hand hygiene and nursing quality of personnel. Methods A total of 120 cases of medical staffs in 10 key operation sections were selected as study subjects between May 2014 and June 2015. By the random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group, 60 cases in each. The control group implemented routine operation room management. On the basis, the observation group adopt PDCA circulation method to manage the operation room. The implementation rate of hand hygiene, awareness rate of hand hygiene, incidence of adverse events and patients' satisfaction to nursing were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, the implementation rate and awareness rate of hand hygiene in the observation group (83.3%, 81.7%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (66.7%, 65.0%) (P<0.05); The incidence rate of adverse events in the observation group (23.3%) was lower than that in the control group (40.0%) (P<0.05); The patients’satisfaction to nursing in observation group (88.3%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.3% ) (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of PDCA circulation method in operation room management can effectively improve the implementation rate and awareness rate of hand hygiene, and improve the nursing quality, which is worthy of clinical promotion. -
表 1 两组人员手卫生执行率及手卫生知晓率比较(n=60)
组别 手卫生执行率 手卫生知晓率 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 观察组 38(63.3) 50(83.3)* 37(61.7) 49(81.7)* 对照组 36(60.0) 40(66.7) 38(63.3) 39(65.0) χ2 0.146 4.444 0.03 4.261 P >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05 *P<0.05 vs 干预前. 表 2 两组手术不良事件发生率比较(n=60)
不良事件 观察组 对照组 缝针断失 1 2 纱布丢失 2 0 患者压疮 7 9 患者感染 4 13 手术不良事件发生率 14(23.3%) 24(40.0%) 表 3 两组患者护理满意率比较
组别 时间 满意 较满意 不满意 满意率 观察组 干预前 18 17 15 35(58.3) 干预后 29 24 7 53(88.3)* 对照组 干预前 19 17 24 36(60.0) 干预后 20 24 16 44(73.3) *P<0.05 vs 干预前. -
[1] 蒋菊英, 方兴, 苏骏灵, 等. 手术室医务人员感染知识及手卫生执行现 状调查[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(1): 231-2, 235. [2] 高雅杰, 马骏. PDCA循环法在Ⅱ型糖尿病患者中医延续护理中的应 用效果研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2013, 24(6): 1493-4. [3] 刘忻, 方素珍, 高小萍, 等. PDCA循环法与精细管理在眼科病房医院 感染管理中的应用[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2013, 23(12): 2957-8. [4] 陈丽, 李妍, 肖红, 等. PDCA 循环法对降低会阴切口感染的探讨 [J]. 护士进修杂志, 2014(10): 893-5. [5] 陈颖, 董叶丽, 黄淳茂, 等. 手术室护士预防手术部位感染依从性的调 查[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2013, 23(21): 5217-9. [6] 刘卫红, 王惠平. PDCA循环在手术物品安全管理中的应用[J]. 护理学 杂志, 2014, 29(6): 42-3. [7] 罗光英, 游灿青, 李凌竹, 等. PDCA循环法在手卫生依从性管理中的 应用[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(11): 2839-41.
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 461
- HTML全文浏览量: 167
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0