Effect of Long Shi Ridge way in the treatment of Cervical Vertigo
-
摘要:
目的探讨龙氏正脊手法治疗颈性眩晕的临床效果。 方法选取颈性眩晕患者98例，随机分为2组，观察组采用龙氏正脊手法治疗，对照组采用常规推拿手法治疗，每周5次，l0次为l个疗程，两组均用相应手法治疗1个疗程。两组都采用“颈性眩晕症状与功能评估量表”进行评估并于治疗后比较其疗效。 结果观察组总有效率为97.96%（48、49），明显高于对照组的71.43%（35/49），两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），治疗后两组眩晕症状和功能评估积分比治疗前均有改善（P＜0.05），观察组比对照组改善更加明显（P＜0.05），两组治疗后颈曲均有所改善，观察组颈曲值改善状况与对照组比较满意度更高，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论龙氏正脊手法治疗颈性眩晕有肯定的疗效，是一种安全有效治疗方法。 Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effect of Long Shi Ridge way in the treatment of cervical vertigo. MethodsNity-eight cervical vertigo patients were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. The observation group was treated with Long Shi ridge way and control group was treated with usual way 5 times each week and 10 times were 1 course. Two groups were treated with correlated way for 1 course. The clinical effect was measured with cervical vertigo symptoms and functional assessment scale, with the scores compared between two groups. Results Total response rate in the observational group was 97.96%(48/49), which was higher than the control group 71.43%(35/49). The difference was significant between two groups(P＜0.05). The score of cervical vertigo symptoms and functional assessment scale in two groups were improved(P＜0.05), and the observational group was more obvious than the control group. Cervical curvature symptom in both groups were improved and the satisfaction rate in the observational group was higher than that of control group, with significant difference (P＜0.05). Conclusion Long Shi Ridge way in the treatment of Cervical Vertigo was of definite effect and was a safe, effective method. -
Key words:
- cervical vertigo /
- Long Shi Ridge way /
- conventional massage way
-
表 1 两组患者疗效比较[n=49，例（%）]
组别 痊愈 显效 好转 无效 观察组 27(55.10) * 16(32.65) * 5(10.20)* 1(2.04) * 对照组 15(30.61) 8(16.33) 12(24.49) 14(28.57) *P ＜0.05 vs对照组. 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 两组患者治疗前后眩晕症状和功能评估积分比较（x±s，n= 49）
组别 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 10.47±4.15 25.93±3.87*△ 对照组 10.51±4.09 21.56±2.85* *P ＜0.05 vs同组治疗前；△ P＜0.05 vs对照组治疗后.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 两组患者治疗前后颈曲的比较（x±s, n=49）
组别 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 3.95±3.26 7.86±3.59 *△ 对照组 4.02±3.17 5.89±3.51* *P ＜0.05 vs同组治疗前; △P＜0.05 vs对照组治疗后.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈婕, 李涓, 陆超, 等. 针灸治疗颈性眩晕的临床研究进展[J]. 四川中医, 2014, 32(1): 175-7. [2] 胡翔, 陆刚锋, 郜锋, 等. 中医手法治疗颈性眩晕的临床研究[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2014, 22(3): 36-8. [3] 陈泽林, 刘富林. 龙氏正骨手法治疗颈性眩晕临床观察[J]. 新中医, 2013, 45(7): 149-50. [4] 张国清, 武慧强. 颈性眩晕治疗近况[J]. 内蒙古中医药, 2013, 24(1): 120-2. [5] 舒剑锋. 颈性眩晕发病机制研究进展[J]. 中医外治杂志, 2013, 22(1): 51-4. [6] 李增春, 陈德玉, 吴德升, 等. 第三届全国颈椎病专题座谈会纪要[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2008, 46(23): 1796-9. [7] 潘旭东, 张典学. 实用脊柱神经病学[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2009: 756-61. [8] 龙层花. 脊椎病因治疗学(纪念版)[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007: 108-17. [9] 章珍明. 龙氏手法"配合针刺晕听区治疗钩椎关节紊乱所致颈性眩晕临床研究[J]. 中医学报, 2014, 29(5): 766-8. [10] 黄友卫. 颈源性眩晕的认识及中西医结合治疗进展[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2012, 21(7): 792-4. [11] 孔令忠, 纪清. 颈性眩晕的发病学研究进展[J]. 湖北中医药大学学报, 2013, 15(4): 62-4. [12] 罗贵聪, 段俊峰, 李艳武, 等. 龙氏正骨手法结合针刀治疗颈性眩晕临床观察[J]. 中国中医急症, 2012, 21(3): 485-6. -
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 472
- HTML全文浏览量: 237
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
