Effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and endoscopic therapy on the prevention of
-
摘要:
目的 分析经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与内镜治疗对食管胃底静脉曲张出血(EGVB)的预防效果,为肝硬化患者早期合理选择治疗方案提供参考依据。 方法 回顾性分析2018年1月~2020年2月于遂宁市中心医院接受一级预防的肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张的89例患者,根据手术方式不同将患者分为两组,其中进行内镜下套扎治疗(EVL)者纳入EVL组(n=43),进行TIPS治疗者纳入TIPS组(n=46),比较两组静脉曲张改善效果,治疗前后门静脉内径、肝功能变化以及治疗后患者EGVB、并发症和死亡发生情况。结果TIPS组和EVL组静脉曲张改善有效率分别为90.70%和86.96%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);两组治疗后肝功能Child-Pugh分级及评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),TIPS组术后门体循环压力差降低(P < 0.05),且治疗后3、6、12、24月时门静脉内径门静脉内径低于EVL组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组治疗后EGVB发生率分别为32.56%和17.39%(P > 0.05),其中TIPS组远期出血(治疗3月后)发生率低于EVL组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组术后并发症发生率、死亡率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 早期TIPS和EVL用于肝硬化患者一级预防均可有效改食管胃底善静脉曲张,有利于降低EGVB发生风险,且TIPS在降低门静脉压力和远期出血发生率方面较EVL具有一定优势。 -
关键词:
- 食管胃底静脉曲张 /
- 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术 /
- 内镜治疗 /
- 预防出血
Abstract:Objective To analyze the the preventive effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic therapy on esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB), and provide a reference for early rational treatment regimen for patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods Eighty-nine patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EGVB who received primary prevention in Suining Central Hospital from January 2018 to February 2020 were selected. They were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods. Among the patients, the cases undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation were set as EVL group (n=43) and the cases receiving TIPS were included in TIPS group (n=46). The improvement effects of varicose veins, changes in portal vein diameter and liver function before and after treatment as well as occurrence of EGVB, complications and death after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of varicose veins improvement was 90.70% in TIPS group and 86.96% in EVL group (P > 0.05). The liver function Child-Pugh classification and score in the two groups showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). The portal-systemic pressure gradient in TIPS group after surgery was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). At 3, 6, 12, 24 months after treatment, the portal vein diameter in TIPS group was smaller than that in EVL group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of EGVB in the two groups after treatment were 32.56% and 17.39% respectively (P > 0.05), and the incidence rate of long-term bleeding after 3 months of treatment was significantly lower in TIPS group than that in EVL group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of postoperative complications and the death rates between 2 groups were not significantly differrent (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both early TIPS and EVL for primary prevention of patients with liver cirrhosis can effectively improve the esophageal and gastric varices and help to reduce the risk of EGVB. TIPS has certain advantages in reducing the portal venous pressure and incidence rate of long-term bleeding. -
表 1 两组治疗效果比较
Table 1. Comparison of therapeutic effects between the two groups [n(%)]
分组 治疗效果 有效率 显效 有效 无效 EVL组(n=43) 28(65.12) 11(25.58) 4(9.30) 39(90.70) TIPS组(n=46) 25(54.35) 15(32.61) 6(13.04) 40(86.96) Z/χ2 1.025 0.312 P 0.305 0.577 EVL: 内镜下套扎治疗; TIPS: 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术. 表 2 两组治疗前后门静脉内径变化比较
Table 2. Comparison of portal vein diameter between the two groups before and after treatment (mm, Mean±SD)
分组 治疗前 治疗后3月 治疗后6月 治疗后12月 治疗后24月 F P EVL组(n=43) 13.54±1.65 13.24±1.53 13.62±1.48 13.07±1.56 13.70±1.64 1.279 0.206 TIPS组(n=46) 13.47±1.62 12.08±1.39 12.37±1.45 12.29±1.42 12.53±1.49 6.264 < 0.001 t 0.202 3.748 4.024 2.469 3.526 P 0.841 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.016 0.001 表 3 两组治疗前后肝功能Child-Pugh分级变化比较
Table 3. Comparison of liver function Child-Pugh classification between the two groups before and after treatment
分组 时间 肝功能Child-Pugh分级[n (%)] 肝功能评分(分, Mean±SD) A级 B级 C级 EVL组 治疗前 8(18.60) 26(60.47) 9(20.93) 8.71±1.24 治疗后3月 10(23.26) 21(48.84) 12(27.91) 9.03±1.35 治疗后6月 9(20.93) 23(53.49) 11(25.58) 9.12±1.28 治疗后12月 8(18.60) 25(58.14) 10(23.26) 9.34±1.19 治疗后24月 7(16.28) 23(53.49) 13(30.23) 9.23±1.36 TIPS组 治疗前 9(19.57) 27(58.70) 10(21.74) 8.67±1.29 治疗后3月 8(17.39) 29(63.04) 9(19.57) 8.92±1.38 治疗后6月 11(23.91) 27(58.70) 8(17.39) 9.17±1.34 治疗后12月 9(19.57) 25(54.35) 12(26.09) 9.08±1.29 治疗后24月 8(17.39) 24(52.17) 14(30.43) 9.26±1.30 表 4 两组EGVB和死亡发生情况比较
Table 4. Comparison of occurrence of EGVB and death between the two groups[n(%)]
分组 EGVB 死亡 近期出血 远期出血 合计 EVL组(n=43) 3(6.98) 11(25.58) 14(32.56) 4(9.30) TIPS组(n=46) 4(8.70) 4(8.70) 8(17.39) 7(15.22) χ2 - 4.522 2.747 0.718 P 1.000 0.033 0.097 0.397 EGVB: 食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血. 表 5 两组并发症比较
Table 5. Comparison of complications between the two groups[n(%)]
分组 并发症类型 合计 感染 新发腹水 HE 肝肾综合征 支架狭窄 EVL组(n=43) 2(4.65) 5(11.63) 2(4.65) 1(2.33) 0(0) 10(23.26) TIPS组(n=46) 1(2.17) 2(4.35) 6(13.04) 3(6.52) 4(10.26) 16(34.78) χ2 - - - - - 1.428 P 0.608 0.256 0.268 0.617 0.117 0.232 HE: 肝性脑病. -
[1] 李莉, 张文辉, 吴静. 全覆膜金属支架在难治性食管静脉曲张破裂出血中的应用[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(2): 147-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2018.02.019 [2] 王昊, 李亭, 贺志军. 肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的综合治疗[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(1): 107-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZPWZ201901021.htm [3] Yoo JJ, Kim SG, Kim YS, et al. Propranolol plus endoscopic ligation for variceal bleeding in patients with significant ascites: propensity score matching analysis[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(5): e18913. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018913 [4] Yan J, Browne W, Kesselman A. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as rescue therapy for endoscopic glue migration and bleeding gastric varices[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2021, 16 (8): 2035-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.05.005 [5] Tejedor-Tejada J, Fuentes-Valenzuela E, García-Pajares F, et al. Long-term clinical outcome and survival predictors in patients with cirrho-sis after 10-mm-covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 44(9): 620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.10.018 [6] 中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版[)J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2019, 37(12): 711-36. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6680.2019.12.003 [7] 孙世蒙, 牟玉珍, 于海东, 等. 基于门静脉压力梯度等多因素的肝硬化门静脉高压食管静脉曲张破裂出血风险评估初步探讨[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29(8): 807-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2020.08.015 [8] 郑晖, 黄兢姚, 黄宁, 等. TIPS治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血预后影响因素分析[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2019, 16(5): 270-4. doi: 10.13929/j.1672-8475.201807028 [9] Manning C, Elzubeir A, Alam S. The role of pre-emptive Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in acute variceal bleeding: a literature review[J]. Ther Adv Chronic Dis, 2021, 12: 2040622321995771. [10] Alvi H, Zuberi BF, Rasheed T, et al. Evaluation of endoscopic variceal band ligation Sessions in obliteration of esophageal varices[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2020, 36(2): 37-41. [11] 刘瑞生. 静脉曲张套扎术在食管静脉曲张中的应用进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(4): 362-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2021.04.016 [12] Park CH, Park SW, Jung JH, et al. Clinical outcomes of sedation during emergency endoscopic band ligation for variceal bleeding: Multicenter cohort study[J]. Dig Endosc, 2020, 32(6): 894-903. doi: 10.1111/den.13610 [13] 郭庆涛, 马超, 李明明, 等. 改良硬化治疗对Le, g型食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效和安全性[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2019, 39(6): 409-11. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2019.06.014 [14] Brand M, Prodehl L, Ede CJ. Surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal haemor-rhage in people with cirrhosis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 10(10): CD001023. [15] Park SW, Jun CH, Choi SK, et al. Successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with embolization subsequent to endoscopic variceal band ligation for bleeding anorectal varices[J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2018, 71(4): 234-8. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2018.71.4.234 [16] 中国医师协会介入医师分会. 中国门静脉高压经颈静脉肝内门体分流术临床实践指南(2019年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(12): 2694-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGD201912013.htm [17] 孙若楠, 张春清. 食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血预防和治疗进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24(4): 607-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.04.039 [18] European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(2): 406-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024 [19] 王艳玲, 韩军, 马雪梅, 等. 食管胃静脉曲张内镜下一级预防治疗对出血率的影响及其相关因素[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2022, 30(4): 407-12. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200529-00284 [20] 郭雅丽, 徐宝宏, 刘贤, 等. 食管静脉曲张内镜治疗术后早期再出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(2): 89-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGD202109019.htm [21] Yu XZ, Bai XL, Li QH, et al. Role of collateral venous circulation in prevention of sinistral portal hypertension after superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center experience[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(9): 2054-61. [22] 王宇, 欧晓娟, 贾继东. 高动力循环在肝硬化疾病进展中的重要性及其治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2017, 25(7): 544-7. [23] Mirchia K, Thibodeau R, Goel A, et al. A successful endovascular repositioning of migrated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stent[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2020, 16(2): 278-83. [24] 丁智锋, 殷世武. Viatorr覆膜支架在经颈静脉肝内门体分流术中的应用现状[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(5): 1107-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGD201805053.htm [25] 郑晖, 杨维竹, 黄宁, 等. 不同直径覆膜支架行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27 (2): 167-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRFS201802016.htm