留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
x

银质针和神经阻滞治疗背部肌筋膜炎的疗效比较:基于红外热成像结果

胡珊 武永清 张彦芳 薛朝霞

胡珊, 武永清, 张彦芳, 薛朝霞. 银质针和神经阻滞治疗背部肌筋膜炎的疗效比较:基于红外热成像结果[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2021, 44(4): 612-617. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.04.08
引用本文: 胡珊, 武永清, 张彦芳, 薛朝霞. 银质针和神经阻滞治疗背部肌筋膜炎的疗效比较:基于红外热成像结果[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2021, 44(4): 612-617. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.04.08
Shan HU, Yongqing WU, Yanfang ZHANG, Zhaoxia XUE. Comparison of silver needle and nerve block in treatment of back myofascial pain based on infrared thermal imaging[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2021, 44(4): 612-617. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.04.08
Citation: Shan HU, Yongqing WU, Yanfang ZHANG, Zhaoxia XUE. Comparison of silver needle and nerve block in treatment of back myofascial pain based on infrared thermal imaging[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2021, 44(4): 612-617. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.04.08

银质针和神经阻滞治疗背部肌筋膜炎的疗效比较:基于红外热成像结果

doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.04.08
基金项目: 

山西医科大学校基金 01201512

详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡珊,硕士,医师,E-mail: hushan0223@163.com

    通讯作者:

    薛朝霞,硕士,主任医师,E-mail: xuezhaoxia63@sxmu.edu.cn

Comparison of silver needle and nerve block in treatment of back myofascial pain based on infrared thermal imaging

  • 摘要: 目的探讨如何根据红外热成像结果选择背部肌筋膜炎最佳治疗方式。方法将诊断为肌筋膜炎的100例患者行红外热成像检查后,测量患侧与相对健侧的温度(△T=患侧温度-相对健侧温度),根据患侧温度高低选出热组(W组, △T≥0.2 ℃)和冷组(C组, △T≤-0.2 ℃),50例/组,每组采用随机数字表法再各分2组,25例/组,分别行银质针导热治疗(S组)和神经阻滞治疗(N组),4组分别简称WS、WN、CS和CN组。银质针导热治疗组共治疗1次,神经阻滞治疗组每5 d 1次,根据患者疼痛缓解情况共行2~3次。在治疗前(0 d)、治疗第1、6、15、30、180天采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛变化。结果随访期内,热组患者在第1、30、180天的VAS评分显示WS组明显高于WN组(P < 0.05);冷组患者在第15、30、180天的VAS评分显示CS组明显低于CN组,两组数据之间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论利用红外热成像进行患区温度判断,热区(△T≥0.2 ℃)选择神经阻滞治疗,冷区(△T≤-0.2℃)选择银质针治疗疗效较好。

     

  • 图  1  患者男性,右侧胸背部疼痛3月,诊断为肌筋膜炎,红外热成像显示右侧温度大于左侧(△T=0.4 ℃),纳入W组

    Figure  1.  A male patient with right chest back pain for 3 months was diagnosed with myofascial pain. Infrared thermal imaging showed that the temperature on the right side was higher than that on the left (△T=0.4 ℃), and he was included in the warm group.

    图  2  患者男性,右侧腰背痛10余年,诊断为肌筋膜炎,红外热成像显示右侧温度小于左侧(△T=-0.3 ℃),纳入C组

    Figure  2.  A male patient with right low back pain for more than 10 years was diagnosed as myofascial pain. Infrared thermal imaging showed that the temperature on the right side was lower than that on the left (△T=-0.3 ℃), and the patient was included in the cold group.

    表  1  进针点皮肤表面达到42±2 ℃加热温度值的设置

    Table  1.   Setting of heating temperature of 42 ± 2 ℃ on the skin surface at the insertion point

    加热温度的设定值(℃) 银质针外露部分长度(mm)
    80 25~35
    90 35~45
    100 40~50
    110 45~55
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  四组患者一般资料比较

    Table  2.   Comparison of general data of four groups of patients

    组别 年龄(岁,Mean±SD 性别(n 部位(n
    WS 43.73±18.20 8 17 4 8 13
    WN 46.50±17.53 10 15 4 10 11
    t2 0.417 0.347 0.472
    P 0.691 0.556 0.927
    CS 55.40±16.09 12 13 6 11 8
    CN 52.55±10.43 10 15 5 10 10
    t2 0.483 0.325 0.361
    P 0.628 0.569 0.835
    WS: 热区银质针导热治疗; WN: 热区神经阻滞治疗; CS: 冷区银质针导热治疗; CN: 冷区神经阻滞治疗.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  随访6月内W组VAS评分比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of VAS between two groups of patients during six months follow-up(Mean±SD, n=25)

    随访时间(d) VAS(WS) VAS(WN) t P
    0 5.69±0.308 5.89±0.351 0.401 0.6912
    1 4.85±0.492 3.72±0.278* 2.124 0.0423
    6 4.00±0.519 3.06±0.235 1.82 0.0791
    15 3.62±0.432 3.00±0.214 1.387 0.1759
    30 3.23±0.709 1.39±0.282* 2.691 0.0117
    180 3.23±0.662 1.11±0.371* 2.989 0.0057
    *P < 0.05 vs WS组. VAS: 视觉模拟评分.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  随访6月内C组VAS评分比较

    Table  4.   Comparison of VAS between two groups of patients during six months follow-up(Mean±SD, n=25)

    随访时间(d) VAS(CS) VAS(CN) t P
    0 5.90±0.315 6.18±0.352 0.592 0.5607
    1 4.80±0.250 5.18±0.296 0.976 0.3414
    6 3.70±0.367 4.09±0.315 0.813 0.4263
    15 2.50±0.373 3.91±0.343* 2.789 0.0117
    30 1.20±0.490 3.18±0.585* 2.569 0.0188
    180 1.30±0.473 3.27±0.715* 2.253 0.0362
    *P < 0.05 vs CS组.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  第30天疗效对比

    Table  5.   Comparison of two groups of patients during 30 days follow-up

    组别 显效 有效 无效 有效率(%) χ2 P
    WS 10 4 11 56
    WN 22 2 1 96# 10.965 0.001
    CS 22 3 0 100
    CN 13 3 9 64 8.672 0.003
    #P < 0.05 vs WS组;P < 0.05 vs CS组.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  第180天疗效对比

    Table  6.   Comparison of efficacy during 180 days follow-up

    组别 显效 有效 无效 有效率(%) χ2 P
    WS 10 4 11 56
    WN 21 2 2 92# 8.42 0.004
    CS 22 0 3 88
    CN 10 1 14 44 10.784 0.001
    #P < 0.05 vs WS组;P < 0.05 vs CS组.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Iaroshevskyi OA, Morozova OG, Logvinenko AV, et al. Nonpharmacological treatment of chronic neck-shoulder myofascial pain in patients with forward head posture[J]. Wiad Lek, 2019, 72 (1): 84-8. doi: 10.36740/WLek201901116
    [2] Rodríguez-Huguet M, Gil-Salú JL, Rodríguez-Huguet P, et al. Effects of myofascial release on pressure pain thresholds in patients with neck pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 97(1): 16-22. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000790
    [3] Weller JL, Comeau D, Otis JD. Myofascial Pain[J]. Semin Neurol, 2018, 38(6): 640-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673674
    [4] Zhang GL, Lin YM, Zhou Q, et al. Silver acupuncture for myofascitis: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(23): e20519. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020519
    [5] Dibai-Filho AV, Guirro EC, Ferreira VT, et al. Reliability of different methodologies of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle[J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2015, 19 (2): 122-8. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0076
    [6] Polidori G, Kinne M, Mereu T, et al. Medical Infrared Thermography in back pain osteopathic management [J]. Complement Ther Med, 2018, 39: 19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.05.010
    [7] Antonaci F, Rossi E, Voiticovschi-Iosob C, et al. Frontal infrared thermography in healthy individuals and chronic migraine patients: Reliability of the method[J]. Cephalalgia, 2019, 39(4): 489-96. doi: 10.1177/0333102418788341
    [8] Park TY, Son S, Lim TG, et al. Hyperthermia associated with spinal radiculopathy as determined by digital infrared thermographic imaging[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(11): e19483. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019483
    [9] da Silva W, Machado ÁS, Souza MA, et al. Can exercise-induced muscle damage be related to changes in skin temperature?[J]. Physiol Meas, 2018, 39(10): 104007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aae6df
    [10] Ioannou S. Functional infrared thermal imaging: a contemporary tool in soft tissue screening[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4
    [11] Law J, Morris DE, Budge H, et al. Infrared thermography[M]//Brown Adipose Tissue. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 259-282.
    [12] 张斌青, 张敏, 郭会利, 等. 红外热成像技术在腰背肌筋膜炎诊断中的应用[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(34): 108-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2015.34.049
    [13] Galasso A, Urits I, An D, et al. A comprehensive review of the treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2020, 24(8): 43. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00877-5
    [14] 左玮. 脊神经后支阻滞治疗腰背肌筋膜炎患者的疗效[J]. 医疗装备, 2020, 33(14): 117-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2020.14.069
    [15] 张倩, 代玉华. 颈背肌筋膜炎的综合康复治疗[J]. 医学信息, 2005, 18 (9): 1211-2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2005.09.096
    [16] 徐达峥, 熊屹. 刮痧疗法配合神经阻滞治疗治疗肩颈部肌筋膜炎[J]. 家庭医药就医选药, 2017(11): 108-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYJT201711130.htm
    [17] 李晓莉, 曾军. 神经阻滞与小针刀治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征疗效分析[J]. 河北医药, 2012, 34(18): 2795-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2012.18.040
    [18] 赵景学, 唐晨, 彭丽岚, 等. 细银质针治疗部队官兵腰肌筋膜炎疼痛及功能障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2019, 25(4): 312-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTYZ201904018.htm
    [19] 胡琴琴, 魏远江, 李宜红, 等. 银质针联合乙哌立松治疗腰部肌筋膜炎患者的临床疗效[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志, 2020(4): 282-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101379-20190806-00043
    [20] 郝龙, 高东梅. 银质针治疗腰肌筋膜炎临床研究[J]. 陕西中医, 2019, 40(8): 1127-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2019.08.039
    [21] 李黎, 王荣. 观察小针刀治疗项背部肌筋膜炎的临床疗效[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(46): 168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201746137.htm
    [22] 陈滨, 张闽光, 冯宇. 小针刀治疗颈肩部肌筋膜炎临床疗效评价[J]. 河北中医, 2017, 39(2): 268-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2017.02.027
    [23] 郭锰, 齐伟, 孙雅蕙, 等. 红外热成像技术在腰背肌筋膜炎诊断中的应用[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(92): 137, 140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCWX201992103.htm
    [24] 唐学章, 丁海涛, 安荣姝, 等. 背肌筋膜炎红外热成像特征及推拿治疗研究[J]. 北京中医药, 2009, 28(10): 760-1, 773. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJZO200910008.htm
    [25] 韩芳苗, 张文杰, 李郑林. 红外热成像技术对平乐推按法治疗腰臀肌筋膜炎临床疗效的评价观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2017, 8(17): 84-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1879.2017.17.042
    [26] Cheng L, Cai HG, Liu ZG, et al. Modified full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy via an inferior endplate approach for lumbar disc herniation: retrospective 3-year results from 321 patients[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 141: e537-e544. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.234
    [27] 赵景学, 彭丽岚, 唐晨. 细银质针治疗腰肌筋膜炎的疗效及红外热成像的应用[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2018, 27(11): 1160-1. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGLX201811015.htm
    [28] 王福根. 银质针导热治疗软组织痛[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 2008: 14.
    [29] 杜冬萍, 许华. 超声引导下疼痛注射治疗[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2018: 26-28;120-121.
    [30] Bordoni B, Sugumar K, Varacallo M. Myofascial Pain[M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2020.
    [31] Skorupska E, Rychlik M, Samborski W. Intensive vasodilatation in the sciatic pain area after dry needling[J]. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2015, 15: 72. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0587-6
    [32] 乔保光, 王燕敏, 赵欢, 等. 红外热像图对体外冲击波治疗急性腰部肌筋膜炎的疗效评价[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2020, 26(8): 621-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2020.08.013
    [33] Kimura Y, Ge HY, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluation of sympathetic vasoconstrictor response following nociceptive stimulation of latent myofascial trigger points in humans[J]. Acta Physiol: Oxf, 2009, 196(4): 411-7. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19210492
    [34] 张斌青, 王军辉, 郭会利, 等. 高温红外热图的分型及对冷热治疗的指导作用[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2015, 13(2): 169-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0512.2015.02.016
    [35] Queme LF, Ross JL, Jankowski MP. Peripheral mechanisms of ischemic myalgia[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2017, 11: 419. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29311839
    [36] 袁仕国, 颜丽满, 武凯, 等. 化学性交感神经切除对肌筋膜激痛点炎症和肌卫星细胞成肌分化的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(15): 2059-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYZ202015008.htm
    [37] Fokam D, Lehmann C. Clinical assessment of arthritic knee pain by infrared thermography[J]. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 2018, 30 (3). DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2017-0218.
    [38] 陈剑虹, 索南草. 脊神经后支阻滞治疗腰部软组织损伤性腰痛疗效观察[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2019, 40(7): 76-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYYX201907026.htm
    [39] Costa Lêdo VR, Xavier AP, de Souza CAZ, et al. Aquatic myofascial release applied after high intensity exercise increases flexibility and decreases pain[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2018, 22(1): . http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29332765
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  997
  • HTML全文浏览量:  277
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-21
  • 刊出日期:  2021-07-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    关于《分子影像学杂志》变更刊期通知

    各位专家、作者、读者:

    为了缩短出版时滞,促进科研成果的快速传播,我刊自2024年1月起,刊期由双月刊变更为月刊。本刊主要栏目有:基础研究、临床研究、技术方法、综述等。

    感谢各位专家、作者、读者长期以来对我刊的支持与厚爱!

    南方医科大学学报编辑部

    《分子影像学杂志》

    2023年12月27日