Quality of medical Apps’ information on obesity, type Ⅱ diabetes and bariatric surgery
-
摘要:
目的 调查中国移动医疗APP中关于肥胖和代谢减重手术患教信息的质量，总结现阶段移动医疗APP中关于肥胖和Ⅱ型糖尿病患教信息质量是否满足患者的需求。 方法 在“Apple Store”和“应用宝”应用搜索栏输入关键字“医”，下载相关App共63个，筛选后共28个App用“Silberg scale”和“Abott scale”评测相关患教信息，再与国外移动医疗APP相关患教消息质量的调查结果做对比分析，初步评测现阶段国内APP在相关患教信息的质量。 结果 在最终评测的28个APP的患教信息得分中，“Silberg scale”量表平均得分为2.96±1.27分，“Abott scale”量表平均得分为1.61±1.08分。内容质量评分为3.85±1.76分。 结论 目前中国移动医疗App中关于肥胖和Ⅱ型糖尿病代谢减重手术患教信息在作者认证、信息来源、信息更新方面较国外APP差距较大，肥胖和Ⅱ型糖尿病外科治疗的患教信息质量较差，患教信息缺乏足够的准确性和权威性，信息内容不够全面，且缺乏及时的更新与修改。患教信息内容单一，对外科治疗的描述不够准确，缺乏在手术风险、并发症以及术后生活方式的介绍。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the quality of teaching information obesity and bariatric surgery on mobile medical Apps in China. Summarizes the quality of teaching information on mobile medical Apps whether meet the needs of patients. Methods We searched the key words " Yi” on the platform of " Apple store”, " Yingyongbao” and downloaded 63 related Apps. After screening, a total of 28 Apps’ related teaching information were evaluated using " Silberg scale” and " Abott scale”. Comparing with the same scores of the foreign medical Apps, evaluate the quality of teaching information obesity and bariatric surgery on mobile medical Apps in China. Results A total of 28 Apps’ teaching information were evaluated, the mean score of " Silberg scale” was 2.96±.96l. The mean score of " Abott scale” was 1.61±0.61. The score for the " Quality of content” was 3.85±1.76. The quality of teaching information obesity and bariatric surgery is poor. It was lacked of sufficient accuracy and authority. The content was not that specific. More, the information was lacked of timely updating and modification. Conclusion The mobile medical Apps in China are supposed to improve the veracity and authority of teaching information. Especially in terms of author authentication, information source, information renew and modification of teaching information. -
Key words:
- medical Apps /
- obesity /
- type Ⅱdiabetes /
- Metabolic bariatric surgery
-
表 1 28个App软件3个量表平均总得分列表（n=28）
App名字 Silberg scale Abott scale 内容质量 平安好医生 4 0 4 百度医生 3 3 4 丁香医生 2 2 3 春雨医生 3 1 2 医生站 4 3 6 点点医 4 0 1 半个医生 5 1 7 大糖医 3 0 5 快速问医生 2 4 3 好大夫在线 5 3 8 慢友帮 2 2 3 微糖 3 2 4 家庭医生在线 2 2 6 健康医生 3 1 2 青苹果健康 6 1 4 39问医路 1 2 2 健康之路 3 2 4 易诊 3 2 2 掌控糖尿病 3 1 5 医口袋 5 0 6 掌握健康 1 0 3 大象就医 2 1 6 乐乐医 4 2 5 心医健康 1 1 2 就医160 2 1 1 趣医院 2 1 3 如医医生 3 3 3 网络医院 2 2 4 平均得分 2.96±1.27(SD=1.60) 1.53±1.05(SD=1.10) 3.85±1.76(SD=3.52) 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 内容质量量表每个条目的平均得分（n=28）
条目 平均得分 肥胖和Ⅱ型糖尿病外科治疗是什么 0.857 外科手术治疗机制 0.714 外科治疗需满足的适应症 1.000 手术治疗效果 0.571 手术风险和术后可能并发症 0.428 术后生活方式的介绍 0.286 总平均得分 3.85±1.76(SD=3.12)
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 刘金钢. 中国代谢外科现状与发展前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(7): 521-3. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK201701001.htm [2] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖和2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2014) [J]. 糖尿病临床, 2014, 8(11): 499-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7851.2014.11.003 [3] 张晓娟, 杜 涓, 杜 潇, 等. 腹腔镜下胃转流术治疗肥胖型2型糖尿病的疗效分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2012, 19(12): 1272-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZPWL201212005.htm [4] Yang W, Lu J, Wang J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(12): 1090-101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908292 [5] American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009[J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(Suppl 1): S13-61. [6] Kasama K, Mui W, Lee WJ, et al. IFSO-APC consensus statements 2011[J]. Obes Surg, 2012, 22(5): 677-84. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0610-7 [7] 刘金钢. 腹腔镜胃肠减容手术治疗2型糖尿病的临床进展[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2011, 16(4): 247-50. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201104006.htm [8] 祝之明. 代谢手术治疗糖尿病的光明前景与现实挑战[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2015, 23(9): 769-72. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTL201509001.htm [9] Zermatten A, Ph D, Yasser K, et al. Quality of web-based information on obsessive compulsive disorder[J]. Neuropsy Disease Treatm, 2010, 27(9): 852-8. [10] Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey[J]. BMJ, 2000, 321(7275): 1511-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1511 [11] Abboudi H, Amin K. Smartphone applications for the urology trainee[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(9): 1371-3. doi: 10.1111/bju.2011.108.issue-9 [12] Connor K, Brady RW, Tulloh B, et al. Smartphone applications (Apps) for bariatric surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2013, 23(10): 1669-72. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0950-y [13] Rivera J, Mcpherson A, Hamilton J, et al. Mobile Apps for weight management: a scoping review[J]. Jmir Mhealth & Uhealth, 2016, 4(3): e87-9. [14] Morel V, Chatton A, Cochand S, et al. Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder[J]. J Affect Disord, 2008, 110(3): 265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.007 [15] Paulus GF, Konings G, Bouvy ND, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up is essential to assess outcome of gastric banding in morbidly obese adolescents: a retrospective analysis[J]. Obes Facts, 2016, 9(5): 344-52. doi: 10.1159/000448193 [16] Fink-Miller E, Rigby A. The utility of the weight and lifestyle inventory(WALI)in predicting 2-Year weight loss after bariatric surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 17(9): 24-8. [17] Zhang W, Ho C, Hawa Raed, et al. Analysis of the information quality of bariatric surgery smartphone applications using the silberg scale[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(1): 163-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1890-5 [18] Jeon E, Park HA, Min YH, et al. Analysis of the information quality of korean obesity-management smartphone applications[J]. Health Informatics J, 2014, 20(1): 23-9. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.1.23 -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 553
- HTML全文浏览量: 255
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
