Femonston frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles in patients with poor endometrial development in application
-
摘要:
目的谈论芬吗通在行冻融周期胚胎移植子宫内膜发育不良患者中的应用 方法48例子宫内膜发育不良患者给予芬吗通激素替代治疗方案治疗,对完成移植周期的38例患者根据是否着床成功分为着床组和未着床组,比较两组一般资料和用药后子宫内膜厚度的变化情况。 结果两组患者年龄、周期前内膜厚度等一般资料差异无统计学意义。着床组用药后9 d和移植日内膜厚度均要大于未着床组,但两组差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);着床组要内膜增加厚度大于未着床组,同时差异具统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论内膜增加厚度可能是影像着床成功率的重要因素之一,而芬吗通在促进子宫内膜发育不良患者内膜容受性改变方面效果较为理想。 Abstract:Objective To talk about femonston frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles in patients with poor endometrial development in application. Methods 48 cases of endometrial dysplasia patients given femonston hormone replacement therapy regimens in the treatment of 38 cases of transplantation, complete cycle of patients according to whether the implantation success divided into implantation group and the non implantation group, changes of endometrial thickness were compared between the two groups after administration of general information and. Results The general data such as endometrial thickness was no significant difference between two groups of patients with age, the cycle before. 9 days after the implantation of medication group and transplantation on endometrial thickness were greater than non implantation group, but no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05); endometrial implantation group to increase the thickness is greater than the non implantation group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Endometrial thickness increase may be an important factor in image implantation success rate, but with femonston in promoting endometrial dysplasia in patients with endometrial receptivity to change aspects of ideal effect. -
Key words:
- Femonston /
- frozen embryo transfer cycles /
- endometrial dysplasia /
- intimal thickness
-
表 1 两组患者一般资料对比
组别 例数 年龄(岁) 不育年限(年) 周期前内膜厚度(mm) 着床组 20 32.43±2.79 4.31±2.16 6.51±0.98 未着床组 18 33.12±2.46 4.09±2.78 6.48±1.12 t 0.805 0.274 0.088 P 0.213 0.393 0.465 表 2 两组患者用药后内膜厚度变化对比
组别 例数 周期前内膜厚度 用药后9 d 内膜厚度 移植日内膜厚度 内膜增加厚度 着床组 20 6.51±0.98 7.42±1.23 8.94±1.28 2.41±1.16 未着床组 18 6.48±1.12 7.26±1.19 8.31±1.09 1.76±1.13 t 0.088 0.407 1.624 1.756 P 0.465 0.343 0.057 0.045 -
[1] Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2010, 8(1): 30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30 [2] 朱鹏云, 林妍, 刘芸. 激素替代方案应用于子宫内膜生长不良患者冻胚移植内膜准备[J]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版, 2012, 6(12): 3289-93. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYD201212032.htm [3] 孙林, 王磊, 柯雪, 等. 芬吗通在冻融周期子宫内膜发育不良患者中的应用[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2014, 23(1): 42-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZYX201401015.htm [4] 李华, 李蓉, 刘洋, 等. 芬吗通改善反复胚胎移植失败患者子宫内膜血流和提高妊娠率的研究[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2014, 23(1): 37-41. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZYX201401013.htm [5] Stammberger HR, Kenney DW.Paranasal sinuses:anatomic terminology and nomenclature[J]. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol, 2011, 167:7-16. [6] Wormald PJ. The agger nasi cell:the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 129(1): 497-507. [7] Choi BI, Lee HJ, Han JK, etal.Detection of hypervascular nodular carcinomas;value of triphasichelical CT compared with iodized oil CT[J]. AJR, 2010, 157(2): 219. [8] Khan MA, Combs CS, Brunt EM, etal.Positron emissiom tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2009, 14(2): 121-6. [9] Tabit CE, Chuang WB,Hamburg NM.Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus:molecular mechanisms and clinical implaications [J].Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2010, 11(1): 61-74. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9134-4 [10] Endemann DH, Schiffrin EL.Endothelial dysfunction[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 15(8): 1983-92.
点击查看大图
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 466
- HTML全文浏览量: 182
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0