留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
x

前列腺癌双探针PET/CT显像的肿瘤负荷及转移与血清前列腺特异性抗原的相关性

许佳玮 刘长青 宋振国 姬琳琳 李现军

许佳玮, 刘长青, 宋振国, 姬琳琳, 李现军. 前列腺癌双探针PET/CT显像的肿瘤负荷及转移与血清前列腺特异性抗原的相关性[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2023, 46(4): 648-653. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.04.13
引用本文: 许佳玮, 刘长青, 宋振国, 姬琳琳, 李现军. 前列腺癌双探针PET/CT显像的肿瘤负荷及转移与血清前列腺特异性抗原的相关性[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2023, 46(4): 648-653. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.04.13
XU Jiawei, LIU Changqing, SONG Zhenguo, JI Linlin, LI Xianjun. Correlation of tumor load, metastasis and serum prostate specific antigen with dual probe PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2023, 46(4): 648-653. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.04.13
Citation: XU Jiawei, LIU Changqing, SONG Zhenguo, JI Linlin, LI Xianjun. Correlation of tumor load, metastasis and serum prostate specific antigen with dual probe PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2023, 46(4): 648-653. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.04.13

前列腺癌双探针PET/CT显像的肿瘤负荷及转移与血清前列腺特异性抗原的相关性

doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.04.13
基金项目: 

潍坊市卫生健康委科研项目 WFWSJK-2022-020

详细信息
    作者简介:

    许佳玮,在读硕士研究生,E-mail: xujiawei9801@163.com

    通讯作者:

    李现军,博士,主任医师,E-mail: lixianjun888@126.com

Correlation of tumor load, metastasis and serum prostate specific antigen with dual probe PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients

  • 摘要:   目的  以18氟-脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)及18氟-前列腺特异性膜抗原(18F-PSMA)双探针PET/CT显像为基础,探究前列腺癌患者的肿瘤负荷和肿瘤转移与血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的关系。  方法  选择2021年3月1日~2022年11月27日潍坊市人民医院经病理组织学确诊的初诊前列腺癌患者共54例,行18F-FDG及18F-PSMA双探针PET/CT检查。依据双探针PET/CT检查及临床资料分为无转移组(n=16)与转移组(n=38),统计所有患者双探针PET/CT检查确定的肿瘤负荷指标,采用Spearman检验对血清PSA与肿瘤负荷指标进行相关性分析,采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间比较。  结果  两组的血清PSA、全身代谢体积、原发灶表达体积、糖酵解总量及表达总量差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);血清PSA > 31.83 μg/L时检测前列腺癌转移的效能最佳,敏感度及特异性分别为84.21%和93.75%;经双探针PET/CT检查获取的各项肿瘤负荷均与血清PSA具有相关性(P < 0.01)。  结论  血清PSA越高提示前列腺癌肿瘤负荷越大,转移组肿瘤负荷均高于无转移组,患者血清PSA > 31.83 μg/L时,提示发生前列腺癌转移的可能性大,有必要行18F-PSMA PET/CT显像全面评估。

     

  • 图  1  某75岁前列腺癌患者PET/CT显像图

    Figure  1.  PET/CT imaging of a 75-year-old prostate cancer patients. A: CT scan image of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging; B: 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging; C: Maximal intensity projection of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging; D: CT scan image of 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging; E: 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging; F: maximal intensity projection of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. 18F-FDG PET/CT image showed a slightly large lymph node adjacent to the right iliac vessels, with no abnormal increase in 18F-FDG uptake, SUVmax=2.4. 18F-PSMA PET/CT image showed a slightly large lymph node adjacent to the right iliac vessels with abnormally high PSMA expression, SUVmax=16.3.

    图  2  血清PSA值监测前列腺癌转移的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve of monitoring prostate cancer metastasis with serum PSA value.

    表  1  双探针显像检出原发灶及各部位转移灶的病例数统计及检出率差异

    Table  1.   Statistics and detection rate difference of primary focus and metastatic focus cases underwent dual probe imaging (n)

    Body parts Cases of 18F-FDG Cases of 18F-PSMA χ2 P
    Primary tumor site 42 50 4.696 0.030
    Lymph node metastasis 20 31 4.495 0.034
    Bone metastases 16 27 4.675 0.031
    Other organ metastases 12 17 1.179 0.278
    18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; 18F-PSMA: 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  双探针显像检查的肿瘤负荷指标与血清PSA相关性

    Table  2.   Correlation between tumor load and serum PSA in dual probe imaging [M(P25, P75)]

    Tumour load indicators Volume (mL) rs P
    MTV 9.71(2.04, 13.78) 0.670 < 0.01
    TMTV 35.54(2.18, 54.26) 0.705 < 0.01
    TLG 115.51(3.66, 158.18) 0.652 < 0.01
    VPSMA 14.17(4.26, 21.92) 0.739 < 0.01
    TVPSMA 63.52(7.26, 87.67) 0.761 < 0.01
    TLUPSMA 458.07(46.51,673.94) 0.708 < 0.01
    MTV: Metabolic tumour volume; TMTV: Total metabolic tumour volume; TLG: Total lesion glycolysis; VPSMA: Volume of PSMA; TVPSMA: Total volume of PSMA; TLUPSMA: Total lesion uptake value of PSMA.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  无转移组与转移组前列腺癌患者各项指标的比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of various indexes of patients with PCa between two groups [M(P25, P75)]

    Index Non-metastatic group Metastatic group Z P
    PSA (ng/mL) 11.69(3.87, 23.93) 68.24(12.3, 107.24) -2.563 0.010
    SUVmax-FDG 4.65(2.70, 6.45) 7.88(4.77, 10.12) -2.782 0.005
    SUVmax-PSMA 12.99(8.3, 19.1) 18.77(6.47, 27.37) -0.098 0.330
    MTV (mL) 2.36(1.11, 2.66) 12.22(3.4, 16.8) -3.654 0.001
    TMTV (mL) 2.36(1.11, 2.66) 46.89(12.75, 61.09) -4.129 0.001
    TLG (mL) 5.12(1.05, 5.19) 153.28(30.88, 199.97) -4.108 0.001
    VPSMA (mL) 4.54(2.02, 7.21) 17.46(7.00, 25.79) -3.621 0.001
    TVPSMA (mL) 4.54(2.02, 7.21) 83.70(27.94, 102.96) -4.971 0.001
    TLUPSMA (mL) 37.60(14.23, 52.27) 605.88(119.15, 885.16) -4.627 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA A Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
    [2] 包森林, 红华. 前列腺癌分子影像学诊断与治疗进展[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2021, 44(2): 396-9. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.02.36
    [3] 李星, 曾晓勇. 中国前列腺癌流行病学研究进展[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(1): 98-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLFY202101019.htm
    [4] 李家山, 曹琦, 马猛. 超声、磁共振动态增强扫描联合PSA检测在前列腺肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2023, 46(2): 281-5. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.17
    [5] Oldan JD, Chin BB. FDG PET/CT imaging of prostate carcinosarcoma[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2016, 41(8): 629-31. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001250
    [6] Li R, Ravizzini GC, Gorin MA, et al. The use of PET/CT in prostate cancer[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2018, 21(1): 4-21. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0007-8
    [7] Ho CL, Wu KK, Chen SR. Current status of PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer[J]. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol, 2020, 16(S3): 7-11. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13313
    [8] Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, et al. Current and emerging clinical applications of PSMA PET diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2021, 62(5): 596-604. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238
    [9] Onal C, Torun N, Akyol F, et al. Integration of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in radiotherapy planning for prostate cancer patients[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2019, 44(9): e510-6. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002691
    [10] 李运轩, 郑安琪, 沈聪, 等. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT全身肿瘤负荷预测前列腺癌血清PSA进展的价值[J]. 西安交通大学学报: 医学版, 2022, 43(2): 186-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAYX202202006.htm
    [11] Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 42(2): 328-54. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
    [12] Gafita A, Bieth M, Krönke M, et al. qPSMA: semiautomatic software for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2019, 60(9): 1277-83. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224055
    [13] Brito AET, Mourato FA, Oliveira RPM, et al. Evaluation of whole-body tumor burden with ^68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2019, 33(5): 344-50. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01342-z
    [14] 谢彦, 李澄, 张露露, 等. 68Ga-PSMA-I & T PET/CT评估初诊前列腺癌原发灶的肿瘤负荷[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2022, 42(8): 1143-8.
    [15] 赵强, 刘辰, 刘佳, 等. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT检查中SUVmax与前列腺癌患者临床病理特点的相关性分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41(1): 13-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYX202303004.htm
    [16] Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel FL, et al. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11(HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2017, 44(8): 1258-68.
    [17] Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, et al. Detection efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy[J]. J Nucl Med, 2019, 60(3): 362-8.
    [18] Mortensen MA, Vilstrup MH, Poulsen MH, et al. A prospective study on dual time 18F-FDG-PET/CT in high-risk prostate cancer patients[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2018, 11(1): 1-4.
    [19] Carroll PH, Mohler JL. NCCN guidelines updates: prostate cancer and prostate cancer early detection[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(5S): 620-3.
    [20] Celli M, De Giorgi U, Caroli P, et al. Clinical value of negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the management of biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patients[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(1): 87-94.
    [21] 田蓉蓉, 赵铭, 周洁, 等. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT对低PSA水平前列腺癌复发的检测价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2020, 40(10): 589-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZL202315024.htm
    [22] 周文瑶, 张俊. 前列腺癌PSMA PET显像剂研究进展[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2020, 40(12): 755-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZL202315024.htm
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  175
  • HTML全文浏览量:  74
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-07-18
  • 刊出日期:  2023-07-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    关于《分子影像学杂志》变更刊期通知

    各位专家、作者、读者:

    为了缩短出版时滞,促进科研成果的快速传播,我刊自2024年1月起,刊期由双月刊变更为月刊。本刊主要栏目有:基础研究、临床研究、技术方法、综述等。

    感谢各位专家、作者、读者长期以来对我刊的支持与厚爱!

    南方医科大学学报编辑部

    《分子影像学杂志》

    2023年12月27日