留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
x

体素内不相干运动成像定量评估肝窦阻塞综合征

吕健 杨桂香 徐中标 郭莉

吕健, 杨桂香, 徐中标, 郭莉. 体素内不相干运动成像定量评估肝窦阻塞综合征[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2023, 46(2): 202-209. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.03
引用本文: 吕健, 杨桂香, 徐中标, 郭莉. 体素内不相干运动成像定量评估肝窦阻塞综合征[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2023, 46(2): 202-209. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.03
LÜ Jian, YANG Guixiang, XU Zhongbiao, GUO Li. Quantitative evaluation of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2023, 46(2): 202-209. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.03
Citation: LÜ Jian, YANG Guixiang, XU Zhongbiao, GUO Li. Quantitative evaluation of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2023, 46(2): 202-209. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.03

体素内不相干运动成像定量评估肝窦阻塞综合征

doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2023.02.03
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(62101144);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515110976,2019A1515111182)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    吕健,博士,E-mail: lyujianmrlab@163.com

    通讯作者:

    郭莉,博士,E-mail: liguosmu@163.com

Quantitative evaluation of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62101144)
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨体素内不相干运动(IVIM)MRI定量参数评估野百合碱诱导的大鼠肝窦阻塞综合征(SOS)微循环障碍的可行性。  方法  选取36只SD大鼠,随机分成SOS组(n=30)和基准组(n=6)。SOS组大鼠用野百合碱溶液灌胃,剂量为160 mg/kg,分别在灌胃后第1、3、5、7、10天随机选取6只大鼠行IVIM MRI检查,测量肝脏的水分子扩散(D)、灌注分数(f)、伪扩散系数(D*)、表观扩散系数(ADC),待扫描完成后处死该组大鼠行肝脏取样,测量病理评分。基准组大鼠不做任何干预,在SOS组开始灌胃前1 d行IVIM MRI检查,扫描完成后处死该组大鼠行肝脏病理检查。根据肝纤维化程度将大鼠肝脏分为正常、早期、晚期SOS。分析IVIM MRI定量参数与病理评分及受试者工作特征曲线的相关性。  结果  DfD*、ADC的定量参数值在第1、3、5天下降,在第7、10天升高,与病理评分呈负相关关系。与正常肝脏比较,“早期”SOS的D(P < 0.01)、f (P < 0.01)、D*(P < 0.001)、ADC(P < 0.001)均降低,“晚期”SOS的D(P < 0.001)、f (P < 0.001)、D*(P < 0.001)、ADC(P < 0.001)进一步降低。f (r=-0.723)与病理评分的相关系数高于D(r=-0.539)、D*(r=-0.550)和ADC(r=-0.554)。鉴别诊断“早期”SOS和“晚期”SOS时Df的ROC曲线下面积值(分别为0.8和0.85)高于D*和ADC(分别为0.74和0.73)。  结论  IVIM MRI可以定量评估不同分期SOS肝脏功能和结构的变化,随着SOS损伤的进展,IVIM MRI定量参数出现不同程度的改变,可以为临床监测SOS进展提供重要信息。

     

  • 图  1  实验方案的流程图

    Figure  1.  Flowchart of experimental protocol.

    图  2  第1天SOS大鼠的MRI图像

    A: 横轴位T1加权图像, 黄色圆圈代表画在肝脏组织内的ROI; B: ADC图; C: D图; D: f图; E: D*图; F: 横轴位T2加权图像; G~J: 去除了R2 < 0.9的像素点的ADC、DfD*图.

    Figure  2.  MRI images of an SOS rat on day 1.

    图  3  6个时间点(基线、第1、3、5、7、10天)肝脏组织HE染色(A~F)和及Masson三色染色(G~L)结果(×400)

    绿色、黄色、黑色、蓝色、红色箭头分别表示水肿、充血、坏死、炎症、纤维化

    Figure  3.  Representative images of H&E stained (A-F) and Masson's trichrome stained (G-L) liver tissues at six timepoints (baseline, day 1, day 3, day 5, day 7, day 10; ×400).

    图  4  参数D(A)、f(B)、D*(C)及ADC(D)在不同观察值之间可重复性的Bland-Altman分析结果

    实线为平均相对偏差, 虚线为95% CI. CV: 变异系数.

    Figure  4.  Bland-Altman plots show the interobserver reproducibility for the measurements of D value (A), f value(B), D* value (C) and ADC value (D).

    图  5  扩散参数和病理评分在不同SOS分期之间的条形图

    A: D值; B: f值; C: D*值; D: ADC值; E: 病理评分, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

    Figure  5.  Bar charts of diffusion parameters and pathological score between different stages in SOS.

    表  1  不同SOS分期下的肝脏MRI量化参数值

    Table  1.   MRI quantitative parameter values in different SOS stages (Mean±SD)

    MRI参数 正常肝脏(n=6) 早期SOS(n=16) 晚期SOS(n=14) P
    D(mm2/s) 1.0±0.06 0.92±0.04 0.88±0.38 < 0.001
    f (%) 25.64±0.79 22.21±1.5 19.29±1.98 < 0.001
    D*(mm2/s) 43.78±4.57 26.79±5.27 18.44±3.96 < 0.001
    ADC(mm2/s) 1.37±0.04 1.15±0.07 1.08±0.06 < 0.001
    SOS: 肝窦阻塞综合征; D: 真扩散系数; f : 灌注分量; D*: 伪扩散系数; ADC: 表观扩散系数.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  病理评分和MRI参数之间的相关系数和95% CI

    Table  2.   Correlation coefficient and 95%CIs between pathological scores and diffusion parameters

    模型 MRI参数 相关系数(95% CI) P
    IVIM D -0.539 (-0.737, -0.255) < 0.001
    f -0.723 (-0.850, -0.518) < 0.001
    D* -0.550 (-0.744, -0.270) < 0.001
    单指数衰减模型 ADC -0.554 (-0.747, -0.276) < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  扩散参数诊断不同分期SOS的准确度

    Table  3.   Diagnostic accuracy of D, f, D* and ADC values for differentiating SOS stages

    不同分期及参数 AUC 95% CI 截断值 敏感度(%) 特异性(%) Youden指数
    鉴别诊断正常肝脏和SOS
      D 0.98 0.87~1.00 ≤0.94 96.7 100 0.97
      f 0.99 0.88~1.00 ≤24.26 96.7 100 0.97
      D* 0.99 0.89~1.00 ≤36.95 96.7 100 0.97
      ADC 0.99 0.89~1.00 ≤1.272 96.7 100 0.97
    鉴别诊断“晚期”SOS
      D 0.86 0.69~0.95 ≤0.91 85.7 72.7 0.58
      f 0.89 0.74~0.97 ≤22.0 92.9 81.8 0.75
      D* 0.81 0.65~0.92 ≤26.47 100 54.6 0.55
      ADC 0.81 0.64~0.91 ≤1.164 92.9 54.5 0.47
    鉴别诊断“早期”SOS和“晚期”SOS
      D 0.80 0.62~0.93 ≤0.91 85.7 62.5 0.48
      f 0.85 0.67~0.95 ≤21.07 92.9 75.0 0.68
      D* 0.74 0.55~0.88 ≤22.52 78.6 62.5 0.41
      ADC 0.73 0.54~0.87 ≤1.063 42.9 87.5 0.43
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Dominique-Charles V, Dominique C-H. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2016, 40(4): 378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.01.006
    [2] DeLeve LD, Shulman HM, McDonald GB. Toxic injury to hepatic sinusoids: sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease)[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2002, 22(1): 27-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-23204
    [3] Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, et al. Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15(3): 460-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh095
    [4] Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, et al. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(13): 2065-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3074
    [5] Ryan P, Nanji S, Pollett A, et al. Chemotherapy-induced liver injury in metastatic colorectal cancer: semiquantitative histologic analysis of 334 resected liver specimens shows that vascular injury but not steatohepatitis is associated with preoperative chemotherapy[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2010, 34(6): 784-91. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181dc242c
    [6] Aloia T, Sebagh M, Plasse M, et al. Liver histology and surgical outcomes after preoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer liver metastases[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(31): 4983-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.8156
    [7] Akıncı B, Atay D, Demir Yenigürbüz F, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric patients with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2022, 20(7): 680-6. doi: 10.6002/ect.2021.0475
    [8] 中华医学会消化病学分会肝胆疾病协作组. 吡咯生物碱相关肝窦阻塞综合征诊断和治疗专家共识意见(2017年, 南京)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(9): 1627-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.09.003
    [9] Fan CQ, Crawford JM. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic veno-occlusive disease)[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2014, 4(4): 332-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.10.002
    [10] 王露露, 孙璟. 吡咯生物碱导致的肝窦阻塞综合征的诊治进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2020, 40(2): 96-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2020.02.008
    [11] Arotçarena R, Calès V, Berthelémy P, et al. Severe sinusoidal lesions: a serious and overlooked complication of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy?[J]. Gastroentérologie Clinique Biol, 2006, 30(11): 1313-6. doi: 10.1016/S0399-8320(06)73542-4
    [12] Tisman G, MacDonald D, Shindell N, et al. Oxaliplatin toxicity masquerading as recurrent colon cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(15): 3202-4.
    [13] Viganò L, Rubbia-Brandt L, De Rosa G, et al. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases after chemotherapy: risk factors, preoperative assessment and clinical impact[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(13): 4149-57. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4533-0
    [14] Hubert C, Fervaille C, Sempoux C, et al. Prevalence and clinical relevance of pathological hepatic changes occurring after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases[J]. Surgery, 2010, 147(2): 185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.01.004
    [15] Ward J, Guthrie JA, Sheridan MB, et al. Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome diagnosed with superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chemotherapy-treated colorectal liver metastases[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(26): 4304-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1893
    [16] Shin NY, Kim MJ, Lim JS, et al. Accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in patients with chemotherapy-treated colorectal liver metastases[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(4): 864-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2333-x
    [17] Han NY, Park BJ, Sung DJ, et al. Chemotherapy-induced focal hepatopathy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy: gadoxetic acid: enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with clinical-pathologic correlation[J]. Radiology, 2014, 271(2): 416-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131810
    [18] Donati F, Cioni D, Guarino S, et al. Chemotherapy-induced liver injury in patients with colorectal liver metastases: findings from MR imaging[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(4): 867. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040867
    [19] Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders[J]. Radiology, 1986, 161(2): 401-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909
    [20] Chow AM, Gao DS, Fan SJ, et al. Liver fibrosis: an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) study[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 36(1): 159-67. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23607
    [21] Baliyan V, Das CJ, Sharma R, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging: technique and applications[J]. World J Radiol, 2016, 8(9): 785-98. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.785
    [22] Leitão HS, Doblas S, Garteiser P, et al. Hepatic fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis: influence on the MR viscoelastic and diffusion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease[J]. Radiology, 2017, 283(1): 98-107. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151570
    [23] Lefebvre T, Hébert M, Bilodeau L, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI for the characterization of inflammation in chronic liver disease[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(3): 1347-58. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07203-y
    [24] Yang JX, Meng MZ, Pan CJ, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to early detect tissue injury and microcirculation alteration in hepatic injury induced by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in a rat model[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 54(3): 751-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27604
    [25] DeLeve LD, McCuskey RS, Wang X, et al. Characterization of a reproducible rat model of hepatic veno-occlusive disease[J]. Hepatology, 1999, 29(6): 1779-91. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290615
    [26] Hong EK, Joo I, Park J, et al. Assessment of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging: an experimental study in a rat model[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 51(1): 81-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26790
    [27] Lyu J, Yang GX, Mei YJ, et al. Non-Gaussian diffusion models and T1 rho quantification in the assessment of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in rats[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 52(4): 1110-21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27156
    [28] Narita M, Hatano E, Tamaki N, et al. Dai-Kenchu-to attenuates rat sinusoidal obstruction syndrome by inhibiting the accumulation of neutrophils in the liver[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 24(6): 1051-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05795.x
    [29] Deleve LD, Wang XD, Tsai J, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease) in the rat is prevented by matrix metalloproteinase inhibition[J]. Gastroenterology, 2003, 125(3): 882-90. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)01056-4
    [30] Prié S, Stewart DJ, Dupuis J. EndothelinA receptor blockade improves nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension[J]. Circulation, 1998, 97(21): 2169-74. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.21.2169
    [31] Panagiotaki E, Walker-Samuel S, Siow B, et al. Noninvasive quantification of solid tumor microstructure using VERDICT MRI[J]. Cancer Res, 2014, 74(7): 1902-12. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2511
    [32] Guo CW, Shen SD, Zhang Y, et al. Determination of apparent diffusion coefficient to quantitatively study partial hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in a rabbit model[J]. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43(5): 1474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.183
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  139
  • HTML全文浏览量:  77
  • PDF下载量:  14
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-28
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    关于《分子影像学杂志》变更刊期通知

    各位专家、作者、读者:

    为了缩短出版时滞,促进科研成果的快速传播,我刊自2024年1月起,刊期由双月刊变更为月刊。本刊主要栏目有:基础研究、临床研究、技术方法、综述等。

    感谢各位专家、作者、读者长期以来对我刊的支持与厚爱!

    南方医科大学学报编辑部

    《分子影像学杂志》

    2023年12月27日