Diagnostic performance of synchronous 12-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram combined with spiral CT in coronary vascular lesions
-
摘要:
目的研究同步12导联动态心电图(AECG)联合螺旋CT对冠脉血管病变程度的诊断效能。 方法选择本院2018年4月~ 2020年8月诊治的90例冠心病患者作为研究对象,均在本院接受螺旋CT和AECG检查,根据患者冠脉血管病变程度将患者分为A组(单支病变)和B组(多支病变)。以冠状动脉造影为金标准,分析比较两种方法联合对冠脉血管病变程度的诊断价值。 结果两组患者心率、房室性早搏、房速、室速比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但A组患者ST、ST/HR均显著低于B组(P < 0.05);A组钙化积分明显低于B组(P < 0.05);ST、ST/HR以及钙化积分均与冠脉病变程度呈正相关(P < 0.05);AECG联合螺旋CT诊断冠脉血管的诊断敏感度、特异度、准确率以及阳性、阴性预测值均高于单一诊断(P < 0.05)。 结论ST、ST/HR以及钙化积分变化均与冠脉血管病变密切相关,将同步12导联AECG与螺旋CT联合可提高对冠脉血管病病变程度的诊断效能。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the diagnostic performance of synchronous 12-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) combined with spiral CT in coronary vascular lesions. MethodsBetween April 2018 and August 2020, 90 patients with coronary heart disease who were subjected to spiral CT and AECG examinations were enrolled. According to the degree of coronary vascular lesions, the patients were divided into group A and B. Taking coronary angiography as the golden standard, the diagnostic value of the combination of the two methods for coronary vascular lesions was evaluated. ResultsThe differences in HR, atrioventricular premature beats, atrial tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05), but the ST and ST/HR of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P < 0.05). Group A had significantly lower calcification scores than group B (P < 0.05). ST, ST/HR and calcification scores were positively correlated with the degree of coronary artery lesions (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate, positive and negative predictive values of AECG combined with spiral CT in the diagnosis of coronary vascular lesions were higher than those of single diagnosis (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe changes of ST, ST/HR and calcification scores are closely related to coronary vascular lesions. Combining synchronous 12-lead AECG with spiral CT can improve the diagnostic efficiency. -
Key words:
- 12-lead /
- ambulatory electrocardiogram /
- spiral CT /
- coronary blood vessel /
- severity of lesion
-
表 1 多组间AECG指标比较
Table 1. Comparison of AECG indexes between the groups (Mean±SD)
分组 心率(次/min) 房性早搏(ms) 室性早搏(ms) 房速(ms) 室速(ms) ST(mV) ST/HR(μv/bpm) A组(n=41) 68.18±6.83 365.24±132.38 61.27±18.63 5.19±1.84 0.32±0.11 1.05±0.37 1.62±0.58 B组(n=49) 71.06±7.39 318.62±129.48 69.34±30.24 4.52±1.72 0.38±0.20 1.69±0.65 2.37±0.71 t 1.905 1.680 1.488 1.783 1.715 5.589 5.417 P 0.060 0.097 0.140 0.078 0.090 < 0.001 < 0.001 表 2 ST、ST/HR以及钙化积分与冠脉病变程度的相关性
Table 2. Correlation between ST, ST/HR, calcification score and the degree of coronary artery lesions
项目 r P ST 0.633 < 0.001 ST/HR 0.543 < 0.001 钙化积分 0.724 < 0.001 表 3 AECG联合螺旋CT诊断情况
Table 3. Diagnosis by AECG combined with spiral CT
检查方法 冠状动脉造影 单支病变 多支病变 合计 AECG 单支病变 29 28 57 多支病变 12 21 33 合计 41 49 90 螺旋CT 单支病变 25 5 30 多支病变 16 44 60 合计 41 49 90 AECG联合螺旋CT 单支病变 35 3 38 多支病变 6 46 52 合计 41 49 90 表 4 三种诊断方法的诊断效能比较
Table 4. Comparison of diagnostic efficiency among the three methods (%)
检查方法 敏感度 特异度 准确率 阳性预测值 阴性预测值 AECG 70.73 42.86* 55.56* 50.88* 63.64* 螺旋CT 60.98* 89.80 76.67 83.33 73.33 AECG联合螺旋CT 85.37 93.88 90.00 92.11 88.46 *P < 0.05 vs AECG联合螺旋CT组. -
[1] Chen G, Levy D. Contributions of the Framingham heart study to the epidemiology of coronary heart disease[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2016, 1 (7): 825-30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2050 [2] Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Wilkins E, et al. Trends in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK[J]. Heart, 2016, 102 (24): 1945-52. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309573 [3] Tachibana M, Miyoshi T, Osawa K, et al. Measurement of epicardial fat thickness by transthoracic echocardiography for predicting highrisk coronary artery plaques [J]. Heart Vessel, 2016, 31(11): 1758-66. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0802-5 [4] Karunadas CP, Mathew C. Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period[J]. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, 2020, 20(2): 49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013 [5] Yao LP, Zhang L, Li HM, et al. Assessment of coronary artery by prospective ECG-triggered 256 multi--slice CT on children with congenital heart disease [J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 33(12): 2021-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1150-y [6] 吴志红, 杨瑞. CT血管成像联合12导联动态心电图在冠心病诊断中的应用[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2019, 17(5): 83-5, 136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR201905025.htm [7] 中华医学会老年医学分会, 高龄老年冠心病诊治中国专家. 高龄老年冠心病诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 683-91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2016.07.001 [8] Habibi SE, Shah R, Berzingi CO, et al. Left main coronary artery Stenosis: severity evaluation and implications for management[J]. Expert Rev CardiovascTher, 2017, 15(3): 157-63. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1294065 [9] 周志明, 贾德安, 胡宾, 等. 疑诊冠心病患者冠状动脉病变程度预测评分系统的建立及效能分析[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2016, 35(2): 106-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2016.02.007 [10] 张茵, 宋雷, 宋莹, 等. 冠状动脉病变钙化程度对介入治疗后冠心病患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(1): 34-41. [11] 程慧磊. 12导联动态心电图与平板运动试验诊断冠心病心肌缺血的临床对比分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(1): 16-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXYY202001005.htm [12] Perez-Alday EA, Bender A, German D, et al. Dynamic predictive accuracy of electrocardiographic biomarkers of sudden cardiac death within a survival framework: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study [J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2019, 19(1): 255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1234-9 [13] 张天毅, 纪亚杰, 王俊彪, 等. 心电图aVR导联判断急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉病变程度以及心功能状况的关系研究[J]. 中国医学装备, 2019, 16(3): 79-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXZB201903023.htm [14] 单自琴. 动态心电图QTc间期对可疑冠心病患者心肌缺血诊断的临床意义[J]. 医学综述, 2015, 21(2): 317-9, 326. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2015.02.048 [15] 冯慧, 吴钟伟, 刘超权. 冠心病患者心率变异性指标与冠状动脉病变程度的关系[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2019, 36(12): 1472-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXWZ201912021.htm [16] 刘爱国, 付喜文, 宋玮, 等. 冠心病病人冠状动脉狭窄程度与心肌缺血总负荷的相关性研究[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2015, 13 (18): 2088-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2015.18.019 [17] 胥军, 吴建中, 姜海燕, 等. 冠心病患者心率变异性与冠状动脉病变狭窄范围及严重程度的关系研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2019, 19 (9): 1679-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX201909016.htm [18] 黄勇, 丁仁福, 符惠宏, 等. 128层螺旋CT冠脉成像在诊断及分级评价冠心病的临床价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(6): 1150-2. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ201606057.htm [19] Kaur M, Rahimi R, Razali F, et al. Association of coronary artery calcium score with calcification and degree of Stenosis: an autopsy study [J]. Malays J Pathol, 2019, 41(2): 177-83. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/338970033_Association_of_coronary_artery_calcium_score_with_calcification_and_degree_of_stenosis_An_autopsy_study [20] 李宁, 李海涛, 陈亮. 冠脉钙化程度对256层螺旋CT诊断冠脉狭窄病变的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2014, 30(8): 1254-7. [21] Song FX, Zhou J, Zhou JJ, et al. The diagnosis of coronary plaque stability by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(4): 2365-76. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29850142 [22] 李连海, 褚怀德, 刘建伟, 等. 12导联动态心电图与常规心电图对老年冠心病病人无症状心肌缺血和心律失常的诊断价值[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2019, 17(5): 787-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYYY201905041.htm [23] Hoshino M, Kawai H, Sarai M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of stenotic severity and plaque characteristics by coronary CT angiography in patients scheduled for carotid artery revascularization [J]. JAtherosclerThromb, 2018, 25(10): 1022-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459518 [24] 孙宇姣, 俞鑫, 耿松, 等. 应用多排螺旋CT评估冠心病危险因素与冠状动脉病变程度的关系[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(39): 3133-6. [25] 王一超, 王莺, 周振堰, 等. 多排螺旋CT评估老年冠心病患者的冠状动脉病变严重性与左心室收缩功能[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2020, 43 (4): 651-4.