x
Volume 47 Issue 3
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Peng, NIU Meichen, LIU Hong. Application of compressed sensing- mDIXON, spectrally attenuated inversion recovery and short-time of inversion recovery techniques in lumbar MR scanning[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2024, 47(3): 304-310. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.13
Citation: LIU Peng, NIU Meichen, LIU Hong. Application of compressed sensing- mDIXON, spectrally attenuated inversion recovery and short-time of inversion recovery techniques in lumbar MR scanning[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2024, 47(3): 304-310. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.13

Application of compressed sensing- mDIXON, spectrally attenuated inversion recovery and short-time of inversion recovery techniques in lumbar MR scanning

doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.13
  • Received Date: 2024-01-18
    Available Online: 2024-04-17
  • Publish Date: 2024-03-20
  •   Objective   To study the application value of compressed sensing (CS) combined with mDIXON technique, spectrally attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) technique and short- time of inversion recovery (STIR) technique in lumbar MR by suppressing fat.   Methods   A total of 60 patients with lumbar diseases who underwent MR examination in Fuyang People's Hospital from September 7, 2023 to January 9, 2024 were selected for sagittal T2WI scans with techniques of CS-mDIXON, SPAIR and STIR. The image quality of the three groups were subjectively evaluated by two doctors using 5-point system. A region of interest was placed in the median position and relevant air area of the L2 and L5 vertebral bodies and L1/2 and L5/S1 intervertebral discs. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated.   Results   The subjective scores were consistent (Kappa>0.75). CS-mDIXON technique has better scores than SPAIR technique and STIR technique (P < 0.05); At the level of L2 and L5, the signal value and noise value of the three groups increased in turn, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The SNR and CNR values of CS-mDIXON technique were higher than those of SPAIR and STIR technique, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001); At the level of L1/2 and L5/S1, the signal intensity values of CS- mDIXON technique were lower than those of the latter two groups, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The noise values of the three groups increased in turn, while the SNR and CNR values of the three groups decreased in turn, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001).   Conclusion   In lumbar MR Scanning, CSmDIXON technique has a better effect on fat suppression and reduces the scanning time, and it can be the best choice for the scan of lumbar MR by fat suppressing sequence.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Wu P, Huang C, Li W, et al. Application of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in the clinical diagnosis of disc herniation after lumbar spine injury[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 6610988.
    [2]
    Lorenc T, Gołębiowski M, Michalski W, et al. High-resolution, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging axial load dynamic study improves diagnostics of the lumbar spine in clinical practice[J]. World J Orthop, 2022, 13(1): 87-101. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.87
    [3]
    陈孟艳, 栗敏. 驼背患者腰椎侧卧位MR检查的应用价值[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(3): 437-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2023.03.034
    [4]
    田燕, 马密密, 曹新山. 磁共振脂肪定量技术在骨髓脂肪定量中的应用及进展[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2020, 30(11): 2113-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ202011046.htm
    [5]
    王卓, 吴祺, 张丽娜. mDixon-Quant技术的临床应用研究进展[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2024, 40(1): 154-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2024.01.036
    [6]
    陈文静, 范海涛, 燕桂新. 磁共振不同脂肪抑制技术在卵巢囊性病变中的诊断价值[J]. 中国医学装备, 2019, 16(10): 45-7. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2019.10.013
    [7]
    杨超, 阳波, 徐隽. 3D梯度回波Dixon技术对全肝脂肪肝的定量及治疗效果的评价[J]. 中国医学装备, 2022, 19(3): 102-5. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2022.03.021
    [8]
    Masrochah S, Fatimah F, Yunitaningrum N. Analisa informasi citra MRI cervical potongan sagital pada variasi nilai time repetition (TR) dengan sekuens short tau inversion recovery (STIR)[J]. J Imejing Diagn Jimed, 2020, 6(2): 79-85.
    [9]
    吕艳秋, 王尉, 高帅一, 等. 频率偏移在儿童胸椎快速自旋回波T1WI SPIR抑脂序列图像质量优化中的价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2023, 14(8): 108-12, 117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC202308017.htm
    [10]
    莫贤福, 张鑫涛, 叶强, 等. PDW-SPAIR序列对类风湿性关节炎活动性病变的诊断价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2019, 10(10): 757-61. doi: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.10.008
    [11]
    Kido T, Hirai K, Ogawa R, et al. Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2021, 23(1): 10. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5
    [12]
    孙丽娟, 王家正, 宋清伟, 等. 压缩感知联合并行成像对肾脏3D mDIXON序列的应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2022, 38(1): 144-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2022.01.034
    [13]
    Naresh NK, Malone L, Fujiwara T, et al. Use of compressed sensing to reduce scan time and breath-holding for cardiac cine balanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging in children and young adults[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2021, 51(7): 1192-201. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04952-2
    [14]
    Huang RF, Pan FM, Kong C, et al. Age- and sex-dependent differences in the morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles between subjects with and without lumbar degenerative diseases[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 734. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05692-0
    [15]
    Fukushima Y, Matsuda A, Koizumi K, et al. Usefulness of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose lumbar spine CT after spine surgery with metal implant: a phantom study[J]. Acta Radiol, 2021, 62(10): 1333-40. doi: 10.1177/0284185120961424
    [16]
    Morbée L, Chen M, Herregods N, et al. MRI-based synthetic CT of the lumbar spine: geometric measurements for surgery planning in comparison with CT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2021, 144: 109999. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109999
    [17]
    Saifuddin A, Rajakulasingam R, Santiago R, et al. Comparison of lumbar degenerative disc disease using conventional fast spin echo T2W MRI and T2 fast spin echo Dixon sequences[J]. Br J Radiol, 2021, 94(1121): 20201438. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201438
    [18]
    翟树佳, 马景旭, 赵丽萍, 等. mDIXON及氢质子磁共振波谱在原发性骨质疏松症的应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2018, 34(10): 1576-9.
    [19]
    王诗瑜, 刘爱连, 王家正, 等. 压缩感知不同加速因子对肝脏3D-mDixon序列成像质量的影响[J]. 放射学实践, 2020, 35(12): 1605-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSXS202012028.htm
    [20]
    王学东, 刘爱连, 张钦和, 等. 压缩感知技术对3D mDIXON Quant定量分析肝脏脂肪的影响[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2020, 36(11): 1662-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXX202011019.htm
    [21]
    林青, 王佳佳, 孙明华, 等. 心脏磁共振压缩感知电影序列的临床应用[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2020, 36(2): 281-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXX202002038.htm
    [22]
    浦仁旺, 刘爱连, 王家正, 等. 不同压缩感知加速倍数对三维磁共振胰胆管成像图像质量的影响[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2021, 37(1): 128-31.
    [23]
    刘文. MRI-STIR信号变化对老年骨质疏松型骨折患者延迟愈合或不愈合的评估价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2021, 19(9): 150-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR202109034.htm
    [24]
    Zhang Y, Chan SW, Chen JH, et al. Development of U-net breast density segmentation method for fat-sat MR images using transfer learning based on non-fat-sat model[J]. J Digit Imag, 2021, 34(4): 877-87.
    [25]
    蒋平平, 黄涛, 陈燕清, 等. Fast Dixon与SPAIR技术在乳腺癌MRI T2WI序列的对比研究[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2023, 39(3): 404-7, 412. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQZ202403010.htm
    [26]
    Huijgen WHF, van Rijswijk CSP, Bloem JL. Is fat suppression in T1 and T2 FSE with mDixon superior to the frequency selection-based SPAIR technique in musculoskeletal tumor imaging?[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2019, 48(12): 1905-14.
    [27]
    Liang CY, Chen MD, Zhao XX, et al. Multiple mathematical models of diffusion‑weighted magnetic resonance imaging combined with prognostic factors for assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2019, 110: 249-55.
    [28]
    李笑石, 钱一帆, 田娟, 等. Fast Dixon序列结合多次平均激励技术在MR颈椎扫描中的应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 314-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQZ202403010.htm
    [29]
    姚刚, 梁志鹏, 杨亚芳, 等. Dixon与SPAIR技术在颈部MRI中的脂肪抑制效果对比研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(7): 707-12.
    [30]
    张浩南, 宋清伟, 张楠, 等. 压缩感知技术在腰椎磁共振快速成像中的应用[J]. 磁共振成像, 2023, 14(2): 132-7, 144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC202302022.htm
    [31]
    Kishida Y, Koyama H, Seki S, et al. Comparison of fat suppression capability for chest MR imaging with Dixon, SPAIR and STIR techniques at 3 Tesla MR system[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 47: 89-96.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (18) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return