x
Volume 47 Issue 3
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Weiting, MA Guangming, HE Liyu, YANG Lu, JIN Chenwang. Effect of different reconstruction algorithms for ultra-low dose chest CT on quantitative detection of pneumonia and image quality[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2024, 47(3): 282-288. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.10
Citation: CHEN Weiting, MA Guangming, HE Liyu, YANG Lu, JIN Chenwang. Effect of different reconstruction algorithms for ultra-low dose chest CT on quantitative detection of pneumonia and image quality[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2024, 47(3): 282-288. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.10

Effect of different reconstruction algorithms for ultra-low dose chest CT on quantitative detection of pneumonia and image quality

doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.03.10
  • Received Date: 2023-12-19
    Available Online: 2024-04-17
  • Publish Date: 2024-03-20
  •   Objective   To investigate the effect of different image reconstruction algorithms, including filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on AI- assisted quantitative analysis of pneumonia (uAI-Discover-NCP) and image quality under ultra-low dose chest CT scanning conditions.   Methods   Fourty-three patients undergoing follow-up for pneumonia from July to December 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine were included in this study. Each patient underwent personalized ultra-low dose CT scanning. The raw data were reconstructed using filtered back projection, 40% intensity adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V, various intensities of DLIR (DLIR-M, DLIR-H), and DLIR-H with additional E2 edge enhancement (DLIR-H+E2), resulting in five groups of images. Measurements were taken for CT values and noise values in the ROIs-air, lung tissue, thoracic aorta, left subscapularis muscle, and thoracic vertebra 10. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated. Two physicians subjectively rated the overall quality and pneumonia presentation of the five groups of images on a 5-point scale. The images were independently analyzed using CT image-assisted pneumonia quantitative analysis software, recording pneumonia index, pneumonia volume and its percentage, and pneumonia quality and its percentage. Repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman's rank-sum test were used to compare quantitative parameters and subjective scores among groups.   Results   There was no significant difference in CT values of the lung parenchyma, thoracic aorta, left subscapularis muscle, and thoracic vertebra 10 across the five image groups (P>0.05). However, differences in noise values and signal-to-noise ratio among tissues were statistically significant (P < 0.05), with the DLIR- H group demonstrating the lowest image noise and highest signal- to- noise ratio, significantly outperforming the others four groups (P < 0.05). The consistency of subjective scoring by the two physicians was high (Kappa= 0.811- 0.894). There was a significant difference in overall image quality and pneumonia presentation scores across the five groups (P < 0.001), with the highest scores in the DLIR-H and DLIR-H+E2 groups, although the difference between these groups was not significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall variation of the five pneumonia quantitative parameters among the groups (P>0.05).   Conclusion   Under ultra-low dose scanning conditions, AI-assisted quantitative analysis of pneumonia is not affected by the reconstruction algorithm. Compared to filtered back projection and 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V, high- intensity DLIR significantly reduces image noise and noticeably improves image quality, offering substantial clinical diagnostic advantages.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中华医学会放射学分会. 新型冠状病毒肺炎的放射学诊断: 中华医学会放射学分会专家推荐意见(第一版)[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(4): 279-85. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200205-00094
    [2]
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(22): 2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149
    [3]
    Koetzier LR, Mastrodicasa D, Szczykutowicz TP, et al. Deep learning image reconstruction for CT: technical principles and clinical prospects[J]. Radiology, 2023, 306(3): e221257. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221257
    [4]
    高才良, 郎春辉, 李翔, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎不同临床分型首次胸部CT评分及临床表现[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2020, 28(11): 806-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2020.11.002
    [5]
    Xu X, Yu CC, Qu J, et al. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2020, 47(5): 1275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9
    [6]
    Zuo YH, Chen Y, Chen LH, et al. Computed Tomography scanning in patients with COVID‑19: artificial intelligence analysis of lesions volume and outcome[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(12): 5869-77.
    [7]
    唐友发, 王秋霞, 张进华. 深度学习重建算法在肠系膜上动脉CT血管成像中的应用评估[J]. 暨南大学学报: 自然科学与医学版, 2023, 44(3): 316-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNDX202303011.htm
    [8]
    Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, et al. State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms[J]. Radiology, 2019, 293(3): 491-503. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191422
    [9]
    Garg M, Devkota S, Prabhakar N, et al. Ultra-low dose CT chest in acute COVID‑19 pneumonia: a pilot study from India[J]. Diagnostics, 2023, 13(3): 351. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030351
    [10]
    Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, et al. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(7): 3951-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w
    [11]
    Toia GV, Zamora DA, Singleton M, et al. Detectability of small low‑attenuation lesions with deep learning CT image reconstruction: a 24‑reader phantom study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2023, 220(2): 283-95. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28407
    [12]
    张卓璐, 陈菁, 刘卓, 等. 深度学习重建算法对肺部CT定量分析及图像质量的影响[J]. 放射学实践, 2023, 38(4): 434-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSXS202304014.htm
    [13]
    中国肥胖问题工作组. 中国成人超重和肥胖症预防与控制指南(节录)[J]. 营养学报, 2004, 26(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXX200401004.htm
    [14]
    Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product[J]. Radiology, 2010, 257(1): 158-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100047
    [15]
    宋兰, 田杜雪, 王金华, 等. 胸部超低剂量CT应用深度学习重建行肺癌筛查的可行性研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2022, 56(6): 667-72.
    [16]
    Jiang JM, Miao L, Liang X, et al. The value of deep learning image reconstruction in improving the quality of low-dose chest CT images[J]. Diagnostics, 2022, 12(10): 2560. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102560
    [17]
    Racine D, Becce F, Viry A, et al. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: a phantom study[J]. Phys Med, 2020, 76: 28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.004
    [18]
    刘海法, 杨丽, 王琦, 等. 深度学习重建算法对胸部低剂量CT肺结节测量及显示影响的模体研究[J]. 放射学实践, 2023, 38(8): 977-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSXS202308004.htm
    [19]
    Svalkvist A, Fagman E, Vikgren J, et al. Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2023, 24(3): e13871. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13871
    [20]
    Gieraerts C, Dangis A, Janssen L, et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of AI-assisted analysis of lung involvement in COVID-19 at low-dose submillisievert chest CT: sample size implications for clinical trials[J]. Radiol Cardiothorac Imag, 2020, 2(5): e200441. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200441
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (18) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return