Effect comparison of 3 minimally invasive surgeries for subrenal calyx calculi under 20 mm
-
摘要:
目的 比较经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)、微通道经皮肾取石术(MPCNL)和输尿管软镜碎石术(FURL)治疗直径2 cm内肾下盏结石的效果。 方法 选取直径2 cm内肾下盏结石患者150例,随机分成3组,每组50例,分别行PCNL、MPCNL和FURL,比较3种方法手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、术后第1天疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、术后即时和最终结石清除率和手术并发症发生情况。 结果 MPCNL组手术时间最短,术中出血量和术后下床活动时间均低于PCNL组患者(P<0.05)。FURL组患者术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床活动时间以及术后第1天VAS评分均显著低于PCNL组MPCNL组(P<0.05)。PCNL、MPCNL和FURL组即时和最终结石清除率均较高,3组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。FURL组患者术后并发症总发生率低于PCNL和MPCNL组患者(P<0.05)。 结论 PCNL、MPCNL和FURL均为治疗直径2 cm内肾下盏结石的有效手段,其中FURL较PCNL和MPCNL创伤小,术后康复快,并发症发生率低,值得在临床上推广。 Abstract:Objective To compare therapeutic effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURL) for subrenal calyx calculi under 20 mm. Methods 150 patients with subrenal calyx calculi <20 mm were randomly assigned to three groups ( n=50). Patients in different groups received PCNL, MPCNL and FURL respectively, and the operation time, bleeding volume, length of stay, postoperative out-of-bed activity time, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at the first postoperative day, stone free rates and incidence rate of postoperative complications in each group were recorded and compared. Results Operation time in the PCNL group was the shortest among three groups, and its bleeding volume and ambulation time were significantly lower compared to those in PCNL group (P<0.05). Bleeding volume, length of stay, post-operative out-of-bed activity time and VAS scores on the first postoperative day in FURL group were significantly lower than those in PCNL group and MPCNL group (P<0.05). Instant and final stone free rates were high in PCNL, MPCNL and FURL group, and there were no significant differences among them (P>0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative complication was lower in FURL group than that in PCNL and MPCNL group (P<0.05). Conclusion PCNL, MPCNL and FURL are effective treatments for subrenal calyx calculi under 20 mm. FURL, with shorter recovery time and lower incidence rate of postopertive complications, is less invasive compared to PCNL and MPCNL, thus worthy of clinical application and promotion. -
表 1 3组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床活动时间和术后第1天VAS评分(Mean±SD)
组别 手术时间(min) 术中出血量(mL) 住院时间(d) 术后下床活动时间(h) 术后第1天(分) PCNL组 62.8±10.1 84.1±15.4 4.5±2.4 13.5±3.1 3.6±1.2 MPCNL组 44.8±8.5* 48.2±10.9* 3.7±1.5 9.9±2.8* 3.2±1.1 FURL组 52.2±9.7*# 8.8±3.5*# 2.5±1.2*# 6.8±1.7*# 2.6±0.8*# *P<0.05vs PCNL组; #P<0.05vs MPCNL组. PCNL: 经皮肾镜碎石取石术; MPCNL: 微通道经皮肾取石术; FURL: 输尿管软镜碎石术. 表 2 3组患者即时结石清除率、最终结石清除率和并发症发生率[n(%)]
组别 结石清除率 并发症 即时 最终 急性肾功能不全 输尿管损伤 切口感染 血尿 高热 肾绞痛 合计 PCNL组 46(92) 48(96) 1(2) 1(2) 3(6) 3(6) 3(6) 1(2) 12(24) MPCNL组 48(96) 49(98) 0 1(2) 2(4) 2(4) 2(4) 1(2) 10(20) FURL组 42(84) 46(92) 0 1(2) 0 1(2) 0 0 2(6)*# *P<0.05vs PCNL组; #P<0.05vs MPCNL组. PCNL: 经皮肾镜碎石取石术; MPCNL: 微通道经皮肾取石术; FURL: 输尿管软镜碎石术. -
[1] Shoag J, Tasian GE, Goldfarb DS, et al. The new epidemiology of nephrolithiasis[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2015, 22 (4): 273-8. [2] Cone EB, Pareek G, Ursiny M, et al. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy[J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(1): 161-6. [3] Rodriguez D, Sacco DE. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2015, 22(4): 266-72. [4] 文 航, 曾志宇, 朱 黎, 等. 85例老年肾结石合并肾功能不全患者微创手术治疗效果[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2017, 33(09): 4-5. [5] Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(1): 160-6. [6] Skolarikos A, Gross AJ, Krebs A, et al. Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study[J]. J Urol, 2015, 194(1): 137-43. [7] New F, Somani BK. A complete world literature review of quality of life (QOL) in patients with kidney stone disease [J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2016, 17(12): 88-93. [8] Yoshioka T, Otsuki H, Uehara S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in elderly patients[J]. Acta Med Okayama, 2016, 70(3): 159-66. [9] Kang SK, Cho KS, Kang DH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49): e9119-25. [10] Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 36(7): 660-4. [11] Wen J, Xu G, Du C, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial[J]. 2016, 28(4): 22-7. [12] Bagley DH, Healy KA, Kleinmann N. Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm)[J]. Arab J Urol, 2012, 10(3): 296-300. [13] Cho SY. Current status of flexible ureteroscopy in urology[J]. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(10): 680-8. [14] Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, et al. Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones[J]. Urology, 2015, 86(2): 224-9. [15] Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, et al. The "mini-perc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.[J]. World J Urol, 1998, 16(6): 371-4. [16] Marshall VF. Fiber Optics in Urology[J]. J Urol, 1964, 91(1): 110-5. [17] Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter[J]. J Urol, 1974, 112(2): 176-8. [18] Doizi S, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks[J]. Urolithiasis, 2017, 14(2): 1-12. [19] Chen S, Xu B, Liu N, et al. Improved effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi (2 cm): A retrospective study[J]. Canadian Urologic Assoc J, 2015, 9(5): E273-9. [20] 张 克, 张雁钢, 王靖宇, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径<2 cm肾结石的有效性和安全性的meta分析[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 15(09): 639-44. [21] 吴 猛, 刘良兵, 易东风. 软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗直径≤2 cm肾结石5年回顾性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 27(06): 469-71. [22] 彭境罗, 周 刚, 刘幸生, 等. PCNL与FURL治疗小于或等于2 cm肾结石的临床疗效比较[J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(30): 4210-2. [23] 李建华, 姚 吉, 程 伟, 等. 微创经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管软镜碎石术治疗<2 cm肾结石疗效对比[J]. 中国现代医生, 2017, 55(06): 53-6. [24] 常建国. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗直径<20 mm肾结石60例的临床研究[J]. 中国保健营养, 2017, 27(26): 33-7. [25] 冷松柏, 钟 毅, 黄 明. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石(≤2 cm)的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 38-41.
点击查看大图
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2707
- HTML全文浏览量: 968
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0