Clinical application of turbine combined with minimally invasive apparatus on the extraction of lower impacted wisdom teeth
-
摘要:
目的 比较涡轮机联合微创拔牙器械法与传统拔牙法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用，比较分析其优缺点。 方法 选择需要拔除的下颌低位阻生智齿82例，按照随机分配原则分为实验组与对照组，每组41例。实验组为微创拔牙器械结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法，对照组为传统拔牙器械拔牙法。比较两组的断根率、拔牙窝不完整率、牙科畏惧症发生率、手术时间以及术后张口受限度方面的差异。 结果 实验组均为一期愈合，而对照组有4例因感染致延期愈合；实验组的断根率为7.3%，而对照组为22%；实验组拔牙窝不完整0例，对照组拔牙窝不完整18例；实验组的牙科畏惧症发生2例，对照组发生5例。与对照组相比，实验组的手术时间明显缩短，术后张口受限度更轻，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论 与传统拔牙法相比，涡轮机联合微创拔牙器械法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除术中可达到无痛、安全以及微创的目的，具有较好的临床应用前景。 Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical application of extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth under turbine combined minimally invasive extraction instrument method and traditional method of tooth extraction. The advantages and disadvantages were compared. Methods Eighty-two cases with low mandibular impacted wisdom teeth were selected. They were randomly divided into experimental and control group, with 41 cases in each group. Experimental group was performed with minimally invasive tooth extraction knife tooth extraction in combining with the high speed turbine dental drill tooth extraction. Control group was performed with traditional tooth extraction equipment. Increased rate, rate of incomplete tooth extraction sockets, dental fear of disease incidence rate, operation time and postoperative mouth by the limit of differences were compared. Results The experimental group was healed in primary, whereas the control group had 4 cases with delayed healing caused by infection. The rate of root fracture in experimental group was 7.3%, while the control group was 22%. None of experimental group had incompleted of tooth extraction socket, while the control group had 18 cases with incomplete tooth extraction socket. Two cases in experimental group had dental fear of disease, while 5 cases in the control group. Compared with control group, operation time decreased significantly and postoperative mouth was lighter in experimental group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to traditional method of tooth extraction, the minimally invasive tooth extraction technology in the mandibular impacted wisdom teeth low urethral surgery are painless, safe and minimally invasive. It has a good clinical application prospects. -
Key words:
- minimally invasive tooth extraction /
- turbine /
- impacted wisdom tooth
-
[1] 霍 丽, 徐 扬. 高速涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生牙的临床应用[J]. 中国美容医学杂志, 2011, 20(10): 1622-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6455.2011.10.059 [2] 迟 静. 下颌阻生智齿拔除临床观察[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7(7): 51-2. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PLHY201405096.htm [3] 刘丽芳. 分根法和去近中阻力法拔除下颌阻生牙的临床对比分析[J]. 健康大视野, 2013, 29(5): 21-4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDZD201406112.htm [4] 王立福. 微创拔牙法在下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用[J]. 大家健康旬刊, 2016, 10(5): 12-3. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZYX201401020.htm [5] 杨道圣. 微创与传统拔除术用于下颌近中阻生智齿拔除的临床对比观察[J]. 大家健康旬刊, 2016, 10(1): 102-3. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QQHB201412053.htm [6] 秦 历, 祁智芬. 微创拔牙术治疗下颌复杂阻生牙齿的疗效分析[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2015, 2(2): 78-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKKQ201502040.htm [7] 王莹莹. 牙科高速冲击式气动切割手机和锥形束CT在埋伏阻生牙拔除中的临床应用[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2015. [8] 徐 燕, 李 玲. 改良法拔除下颌阻生智齿疗效观察[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2010, 12(9): 88-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDLH201008016.htm [9] 陈 芳, 邵江红. 高速涡轮手机在下颌低位水平阻生智齿拔除术中的临床观察[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2015, 44(7): 810-2. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXYY201507041.htm [10] 匡世军, 周燕武, 严 娟, 等. 三段式横断法拔除下颌低位水平阻生智齿对邻牙影响的研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2011, 04(2): 101-2. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSKQ201102014.htm [11] 王延高, 王 娜. 高速涡轮钻拔除近中阻生智齿的临床探讨[J]. 中外健康文摘, 2012, 09(12): 220-1. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5085.2012.12.199 [12] 康青梅. 应用骨凿增隙拔除难拔牙的体会[J]. 青岛医药卫生, 1996, 34(7): 20-4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QDYW199607014.htm [13] 杨英来, 柳 哲. 浅析涡轮钻法不同于常规法拔除下颌垂直近中阻生齿的疗效[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 30(3): 77-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201730052.htm [14] 周丽斌, 程久兵, 石祖庆, 等. 涡轮机拔牙法和传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙对照研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(1): 70-1. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYX201401024.htm [15] 李志军. 远中去骨或增隙拔除下颌低位近中阻生智齿的临床研究[J]. 中国临床研究, 2012, 25(9): 898-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCK201209041.htm [16] 严伟一, 许 翔. 锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果及安全性对比[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2017, 22(1): 35-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJCW201701015.htm [17] 徐 凯. 微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床效果观察[J]. 大家健康旬刊, 2017, 11(1): 28-30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QQHB201412053.htm [18] 李行健, 王 进. 微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J]. 世界临床医学, 2017, 11(3): 181-2. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QQHB201412053.htm [19] 徐 佳. 浅谈拔牙后常见的并发症及处理[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2013, 36(12): 394-5. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYZ201312403.htm [20] 秦晓芳. 微创在拔牙中的运用[J]. 家庭心理医生, 2015, 17(4): 537-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXS201520115.htm [21] 胡兴周. 高速涡轮牙钻与微创拔牙刀在阻生牙拔除术中的临床应用[J]. 中国中医药咨讯, 2011, 03(5): 2-4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDZD201707088.htm [22] 黎 钢, 雷荣昌, 郭宏剑, 等. 微创拔牙法在下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2011, 27(4): 236-8. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZYX201401020.htm [23] 谭欢艳. 成人牙科畏惧症的临床分析[J]. 右江民族医学院学报, 2013, 35(6): 815-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJMZ201306038.htm [24] Gang LI, Lei RC, Guo HJ, et al. Minimally invasive tooth extraction in mandibular wisdom tooth extraction nearly in the clinical study[J]. J Clinic Stomatol, 2011, 185(4): e337-40. [25] Qi ZU, Wei XU, Wang ZJ, et al. Minimally invasive extraction of 201 teeth[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 12(9): 46-9. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 942
- HTML全文浏览量: 420
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
