Effect of unilateral biportal endoscopic minimally invasive nucleus pulposus enucleation on lumbar disc herniation and effect on JOA score
-
摘要:
目的 探究并分析单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)在腰椎间盘突出(LDH)患者的治疗效果及其对日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的影响。 方法 选取2020年10月~2021年12月收治的69例LDH患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=35)。对照组采用后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合治疗治疗,观察组采用UBE进行治疗。观察两组患者一般资料(年龄、性别、病变区域、手术的时间、病程、出血量等)、手术前后评分即视觉模拟评分(VAS)、JOA评分、腰痛Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。 结果 两组患者术前VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后VAS评分均较术前下降(P<0.05),观察组患者术后1、24、72 h的VAS评分较对照组下降(P<0.05);两组患者术前JOA评分差异无统计学意义(9.34±0.33 vs 9.23±0.43,P>0.05),术后JOA评分均较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者的JOA评分高于对照组(15.54±0.52 vs 14.23±0.43,P<0.05);两组患者术前ODI评分差异无统计学意义(15.43±3.54 vs 15.74±3.34,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组ODI评分较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者ODI评分高于对照组(51.43±3.73 vs 48.75±3.64, P<0.05)。两组患者术前血清HMGB1、IL-6水平差异无统计学意义(4.43±0.54 vs 4.41±0.65、44.74±4.25 vs 45.54±4.54,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组患者较术前均有升高(P<0.05),且观察组患者术后6月均较对照组降低(5.4±0.54 vs 6.54±0.32、46.85±4.45 vs 52.63±4.41,P<0.05)。 结论 UBE手术较后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合术更能有效降低LDH患者的疼痛程度,改善患者腰椎稳定性,值得临床推广。 -
关键词:
- 腰椎间盘突出 /
- 椎间孔镜 /
- 后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合治疗 /
- 炎症因子
Abstract:Objective To explore and analyze the effete of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) surgery in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and its effect on JOA score. Methods A total of 69 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted from October 2020 to December 2021 were randomly divided into observation group (n=34) and control group (n=35) according to random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated with Posterior incision of nucleus pulposus, removal of pedicle, internal fixation and interbody fusion, and the patients in the observation group were treated with UBE. The general data of the two groups (gender, age, lesion location, course of disease, operation time, blood loss, etc. were observed, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score, JOA score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score before and after operation were evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups before operation (P> 0.05), but the VAS score of the two groups after operation was significantly lower than that before operation (P<0.05), and the VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of control group at 1, 24, 72 h after operation (P<0.05); There was no significant difference between the two groups before operation (9.34±0.33 vs 9.23±0.43, P>0.05), and the JOA score of the two groups after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P<0.05), which in the observation group was significantly higher than that in control group 6 months after operation (15.54±0.52 vs 14.23±0.43, P<0.05); There was no significant difference of ODI score between the two groups before operation (15.43±3.54 vs 15.74±3.34, P>0.05), but the ODI score of the two groups 1 month and 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P<0.05), and the ODI score of the observation group 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that of control group (51.43±3.73 vs 48.75±3.64, P<0.05); There was no significant difference in the levels of serum HMGB1 and IL-6 between the two groups before operation (4.43±0.54 vs 4.41±0.65, 44.74±4.25 vs 45.54±4.54, P>0.05), but the levels of serum HMGB1 and IL-6 in the two groups 1 month and 6 months after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05), and the levels of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in control group 6 months after operation (5.4±0.54 vs 6.54±0.32, 46.85±4.45 vs 52.63±4.41, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional disc arthroscopy, UBE surgery can effectively reduce the degree of pain and improve lumbar stability in patients with Posterior incision of nucleus pulposus, removal of pedicle, internal fixation and interbody fusion, which is worthy of clinical promotion. -
表 1 两组患者一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general data between the two groups (Mean±SD)
指标 性别(男/女, n) 年龄(岁) 病程(年) 手术时间(min) 出血量(mL) 观察组(n=34) 16/18 58.43±7.35 2.54±0.54 104.34±11.12 128.13±13.43 对照组(n=35) 15/20 57.31±7.54 2.41±0.43 102.54±12.32 130.25±12.15 t/χ2 0.123 0.625 1.108 0.637 0.688 P 0.726 0.534 0.272 0.527 0.494 表 2 两组患者手术前后VAS评分比较
Table 2. Comparison of VAS scores between the two groups before and after operation (Mean±SD)
组別 VAS评分 术前 术后1 h 术后24h 术后72h 观察组(n=34) 6.54±1.34 1.23±0.43#* 2.34±0.32#* 2.43±0.47#* 对照组(n=35) 6.23±1.45 3.54±0.54* 3.63±0.21* 3.65±0.46* VAS:视觉模拟评分. #P<0.05 vs对照组,*P<0.05 vs术前. 组间: F=10.365,P<0.001; 多时间点F=7.334,P<0.001; 组间多时间点F=9.526,P<0.001. 表 3 两组患者手术前后JOA评分比较
Table 3. Comparison of JOA scores between the two groups before and after operation (Mean±SD)
组别 JOA评分 术前 术后1月 术后6月 观察组(n=34) 9.34±0.33 11.43士0.51#* 15.54士0.52#* 对照组(n=35) 9.23士0.43 10.53±0.65* 14.23士0.43* OA:日本骨科学会评分. #P<0.05 vs对照组,*P<0.05 vs术前. 组间:F= 9.335,P<0.001;多时间点:F=7.968,P<0.001;组间多时间点:F=10.427,P<0.001. 表 4 两组患者手术前后ODI评分比较
Table 4. Comparison of ODI score between two groups (Mean±SD)
组別 ODI评分 术前 术后1月 术后6月 观察组(n=34) 15.43±3.54 27.52±3.41#* 51.43±3.73#* 对照组(n=35) 15.74±3.34 21.64±3.35* 48.75±3.64* ODI:Oswestry功能障碍指数. #P<0.05 vs对照组,*P<0.05 vs术前. 组间:F=13.115,P<0.001;多时间点F=9.354,P<0.001;组间多时间点:F= 11.487,P<0.001. 表 5 两组患者血清指标比较
Table 5. Comparison of serum indexes between the two groups (μg/L, Mean±SD)
组別 HMGB1 IL-6 术前 术后1月 术后6月 术前 术后1月 术后6月 观察组(n=34) 4.43±0.54 7.32±0.46*# 5.4 ±0.54*# 44.74±4.25 51.36±4.64*# 46.85±4.45*# 对照组(n=35) 4.41士0.65 9.35±0.47* 6.54±0.32* 45.5±4.54 59.36±4.54* 52.63±4.41* HMGB1:高迁移率族蛋白B1;IL-6:白细胞介素-6. #P<0.05 vs对照组,*P<0.05 vs术前. 血清HMGB1:组间F=12.879,P<0.001;多时间点F=8.637,P<0.001;组间多时间点F=9.218,P<0.001. 血清IL-6:组间F=13.019,P<0.001;多时间点F±10.527,P<0.001;组间多时间点F=11.634,P<0.001. -
[1] 任孟先, 梁伟, 刘艳. 塞来昔布联合IMRT对老年中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫功能和血清肿瘤标志物的影响[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2021, 41(6): 890-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2021.06.020 [2] 王彬, 武振方, 何鹏, 等. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术并发症及处理的研究进展[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2021, 34(7): 756-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLYB202107017.htm [3] Sharma SB, Lin GX, Jabri H, et al. Biportal endoscopic excision of facetal cyst in the far lateral region of L5S1: 2-dimensional operative video[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2020, 18(6): E233. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz255 [4] 郭卫东, 张小平, 鲍小明, 等. 单侧双通道内镜技术与显微镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效比较[J]. 西安交通大学学报: 医学版, 2022, 43(3): 430-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAYX202203018.htm [5] 朱承跃, 高文硕, 潘浩. 比较经皮后路单通道与双通道治疗L5~S1腰椎间盘突出症的疗效[J]. 江苏医药, 2021, 47(10): 996-1000. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YIYA202110007.htm [6] 陈孝平, 汪建平. 外科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 244-245. [7] 张跃, 朱宇, 李毅, 等. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症68例临床研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2021, 38(11): 2262-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20210313-01092 [8] 王彬, 何鹏, 武振方, 等. 单侧双通道内镜手术与显微内镜手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的Meta分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2021, 31(8): 719-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2021.08.07 [9] 康立星, 杨素梅, 张鹏, 等. 单通道、单侧双通道和双侧三通道脊柱内镜技术对腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效比较[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(10): 1323-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2021.10.014 [10] 刘维曦, 刘刚, 闫鹏磊, 等. 单侧双通道内镜技术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的近期疗效[J]. 江苏医药, 2021, 47(8): 822-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YIYA202108017.htm [11] 张伟, 党晨珀, 姚彦斌, 等. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2021, 42(5): 341-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBGY202105016.htm [12] 陈涛, 王倩楠, 张成, 等. 单侧双通道内镜技术下椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2021, 36(9): 905-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202109003.htm [13] An JW, Lee CW. Surgical treatment of extraforaminal gascontaining pseudocyst compressing L5 nerve root by using unilateral biportal endoscopy[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 124: 145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.186 [14] 曹臣, 陈书连, 高延征, 等. 单侧双通道内镜治疗重度脱垂型腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30(3): 273-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202215014.htm [15] 张腾. 单侧双通道内镜技术对腰椎间盘突出合并腰椎管狭窄症患者腰椎功能的改善作用[J]. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志, 2021, 5 (12): 44-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJD202112018.htm [16] 吴鹏, 张国民, 王建儒, 等. 单侧双通道镜下置入超大型号笼架椎间融合[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2021, 29(19): 1796-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS202119021.htm [17] 汪文龙, 刘正, 吴四军, 等. 单侧双通道内镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2021, 31(10): 911-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJZS202110008.htm [18] Aygun H, Abdulshafi K. Unilateral biportal endoscopy versus tubular microendoscopy in management of single level degenerative lumbar canal Stenosis: a prospective study[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2021, 34(6): E323-E328. [19] 孙兵, 车晓明. 日本骨科协会评估治疗(JOA评分) [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(9): 969. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYJ201808073.htm [20] 张盼可, 朱剑, 曹书严, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜技术与单侧双通道内镜技术在单节段腰椎间盘突出症中的临床应用[J]. 河南医学研究, 2022, 31 (4): 617-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYX202204011.htm [21] Kim J, Heo DH, Lee DC, et al. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Acta Neurochir, 2021, 163(9): 2537-43.