[1] |
Ell PJ. The contribution of PET/CT to improved patient management[J]. Br J Radiol, 2006, 79(937): 32-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/18454286
|
[2] |
Lind P, Igerc I, Beyer T, et al. Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004, 31(Suppl 1): S125-34.
|
[3] |
Hess S, Scholtens AM, Gormsen LC. Patient preparation and patient-related challenges with FDG-PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory disease[J]. PET Clin, 2020, 15(2): 125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.11.001
|
[4] |
Yang LJ, Ma L, Lai DM. Over-expression of fibroblast activation protein alpha increases tumor growth in xenografts of ovarian cancer cells[J]. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, 2013, 45(11): 928-37. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt095
|
[5] |
Das S, Valton J, Duchateau P, et al. Stromal depletion by TALEN-edited universal hypoimmunogenic FAP-CAR T cells enables infiltration and anti-tumor cytotoxicity of tumor antigen-targeted CAR-T immunotherapy[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1172681. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172681
|
[6] |
Liu JY, Huang CQ, Peng CW, et al. Stromal fibroblast activation protein alpha promotes gastric cancer progression via epithelial-mesenchymal transition through Wnt/β-catenin pathway[J]. BMC Cancer, 2018, 18(1): 1099. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5035-9
|
[7] |
Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, et al. Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts[J]. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274(51): 36505-12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36505
|
[8] |
Klemann C, Wagner L, Stephan M, et al. Cut to the chase: a review of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase-4's (DPP4) entanglement in the immune system[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2016, 185(1): 1-21. doi: 10.1111/cei.12781
|
[9] |
Larrinaga G, Perez I, Blanco L, et al. Increased prolyl endopeptidase activity in human neoplasia[J]. Regul Pept, 2010, 163(1/2/3): 102-6.
|
[10] |
Hu Y, Ma LF, Wu M, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of N-alkyl Gly-boro-Pro inhibitors of DPP4, FAP, and DPP7[J]. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2005, 15(19): 4239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.075
|
[11] |
Edosada CY, Quan C, Wiesmann C, et al. Selective inhibition of fibroblast activation protein protease based on dipeptide substrate specificity[J]. J Biol Chem, 2006, 281(11): 7437-44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511112200
|
[12] |
Tran T, Quan C, Edosada CY, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of N-acyl-Gly-, N-acyl-Sar-and N-blocked-boroPro inhibitors of FAP, DPP4, and POP[J]. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2007, 17(5): 1438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.11.072
|
[13] |
Poplawski SE, Lai JH, Li YH, et al. Identification of selective and potent inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein and prolyl oligopeptidase[J]. J Med Chem, 2013, 56(9): 3467-77. doi: 10.1021/jm400351a
|
[14] |
Tsai TY, Hsu T, Chen CT, et al. Rational design and synthesis of potent and long-lasting glutamic acid-based dipeptidyl peptidase Ⅳ inhibitors[J]. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2009, 19(7): 1908-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.02.061
|
[15] |
Tsai TY, Yeh TK, Chen X, et al. Substituted 4-carboxymethylpyro-glutamic acid diamides as potent and selective inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein[J]. J Med Chem, 2010, 53(18): 6572-83. doi: 10.1021/jm1002556
|
[16] |
Ryabtsova O, Jansen K, van Goethem S, et al. Acylated Gly-(2-cyano)pyrrolidines as inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and the issue of FAP/prolyl oligopeptidase (PREP)-selectivity[J]. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2012, 22(10): 3412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.03.107
|
[17] |
Jansen K, Heirbaut L, Cheng JD, et al. Selective inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) with a (4-quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine scaffold[J]. ACS Med Chem Lett, 2013, 4(5): 491-6. doi: 10.1021/ml300410d
|
[18] |
Jansen K, Heirbaut L, Verkerk R, et al. Extended structure-activity relationship and pharmacokinetic investigation of (4-quinolinoyl) glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)[J]. J Med Chem, 2014, 57(7): 3053-74. doi: 10.1021/jm500031w
|
[19] |
Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, et al. A tumor-imaging method targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts[J]. J Nucl Med, 2018, 59 (9): 1423-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210435
|
[20] |
Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, et al. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein[J]. Nucl Med, 2018, 59(9): 1415-22. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210443
|
[21] |
Loktev A, Lindner T, Burger EM, et al. Development of fibroblast activation protein-targeted radiotracers with improved tumor retention[J]. J Nucl Med, 2019, 60(10): 1421-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224469
|
[22] |
Jiang X, Wang XX, Shen TP, et al. FAPI-04 PET/CT using 18AlF labeling strategy: automatic synthesis, quality control, and in vivo assessment in patient[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 649148. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649148
|
[23] |
Wei YC, Zheng JS, Ma L, et al. 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04: FAP-targeting specificity, biodistribution, and PET/CT imaging of various cancers[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 49(8): 2761-73. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05758-0
|
[24] |
Elboga U, Sahin E, Kus T, et al. Superiority of 68Ga-fapi pet/ct scan in detecting additional lesions compared to 18FDG pet/ct scan in breast cancer[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2021, 35(12): 1321-31. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01672-x
|
[25] |
Pang YZ, Zhao L, Chen HJ. 68Ga-FAPI outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying bone metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis in a patient with metastatic breast cancer[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2020, 45 (11): 913-5. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003263
|
[26] |
Li TY, Jiang XJ, Zhang ZQ, et al. Case Report: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT, a more advantageous detection mean of gastric, peritoneal, and ovarian metastases from breast cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1013066. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1013066
|
[27] |
Kömek H, Can CN, Güzel Y, et al. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT, a new step in breast cancer imaging: a comparative pilot study with the 18F-FDG PET/CT[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2021, 35(6): 744-52. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01616-5
|
[28] |
Sahin E, Kus T, Aytekin A, et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT as an alternative to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the imaging of invasive lobular breast carcinoma[J]. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(4): 512-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266798
|
[29] |
Chen L, Zheng S, Chen LY, et al. 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT for the early and late prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective study[J]. J Nucl Med, 2023, 64(12): 1899-905. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266079
|
[30] |
Ding F, Huang C, Liang CY, et al. 68Ga-FAPI-04 vs 18F-FDG in a longitudinal preclinical PET imaging of metastatic breast cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 49(1): 290-300. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05442-9
|
[31] |
Kessler L, Ferdinandus J, Hirmas N, et al. Pitfalls and common findings in 68Ga-FAPI PET: a pictorial analysis[J]. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(6): 890-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262808
|
[32] |
Telo S, Calderoni L, Vichi S, et al. Alternative and new radiopharmaceutical agents for lung cancer[J]. Curr Radiopharm, 2020, 13(3): 185-94. doi: 10.2174/1874471013666191223151402
|
[33] |
Wang LJ, Tang GH, Hu KZ, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of advanced lung cancer[J]. Radiology, 2022, 303(1): 191-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211424
|
[34] |
Giesel FL, Heussel CP, Lindner T, et al. FAPI-PET/CT improves staging in a lung cancer patient with cerebral metastasis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(8): 1754-5. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04346-z
|
[35] |
Röhrich M, Daum J, Gutjahr E, et al. Diagnostic potential of supplemental static and dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for primary 18F-FDG-negative pulmonary lesions[J]. J Nucl Med, 2024. 10.2967/jnumed. 123.267103. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267103
|
[36] |
Shang QH, Zhao L, Pang YZ, et al. Differentiation of reactive lymph nodes and tumor metastatic lymph nodes with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in a patient with squamous cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2022, 47(5): 458-61. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003998
|
[37] |
Spektor AM, Gutjahr E, Lang M, et al. Immunohistochemical FAP expression reflects 68Ga-FAPI PET imaging properties of low- and high-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(1): 52-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266393
|
[38] |
Kessler L, Hirmas N, Pabst KM, et al. 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) PET for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: data from the 68Ga-FAPI PET observational trial[J]. J Nucl Med, 2023, 64(12): 1910-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264827
|
[39] |
Liu QF, Shi S, Liu S, et al. The added value of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in pancreatic cancer: a comparison to 18F-FDG[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023, 33(7): 5007-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09445-y
|
[40] |
Ding J, Qiu JD, Hao ZX, et al. Comparing the clinical value of baseline 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: additional prognostic value of the distal pancreatitis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2023, 50(13): 4036-50. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06297-y
|
[41] |
Xu WZ, Cai JY, Peng TX, et al. Fibroblast activation protein-targeted PET/CT with 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-74 for evaluation of gastrointestinal cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(1): 40-51. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266329
|
[42] |
Ding J, Qiu JD, Hao ZX, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in correlation with immunohistological characteristics[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2023, 50(6): 1780-91. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06100-4
|
[43] |
Pang YZ, Zhao L, Shang QH, et al. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography with 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors improves tumor detection and staging in patients with pancreatic cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 49(4): 1322-37. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05576-w
|
[44] |
Kessler L, Ferdinandus J, Hirmas N, et al. 68Ga-FAPI as a diagnostic tool in sarcoma: data from the 68Ga-FAPI PET prospective observational trial[J]. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(1): 89-95. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262096
|
[45] |
Lanzafame H, Mavroeidi IA, Pabst KM, et al. 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT improves detection of intermediate and low-grade sarcomas and identifies candidates for radiopharmaceutical therapy[J]. J Nucl Med, 2024. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267248.
|
[46] |
Röhrich M, Loktev A, Wefers AK, et al. IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ IDH-mutant gliomas show elevated tracer uptake in fibroblast activation protein-specific PET/CT[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(12): 2569-80. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04444-y
|
[47] |
Yao YT, Tan XF, Yin WY, et al. Performance of 18F-FAPI PET/CT in assessing glioblastoma before radiotherapy: a pilot study[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2022, 22(1): 226. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00952-w
|
[48] |
Rajaraman V, Meenakshi LA, Selvaraj AJ, et al. Role of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in assessing hepatobiliary malignancies: a prospective pilot study[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2023, 48(6): e281-e288. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004641
|
[49] |
Zhang J, He Q, Jiang SQ, et al. 18FAPI PET/CT in the evaluation of focal liver lesions with 18FDG non-avidity[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2023, 50(3): 937-50. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06022-1
|
[50] |
Siripongsatian D, Promteangtrong C, Kunawudhi A, et al. Comparisons of quantitative parameters of 68Ga-labelled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2022, 24 (5): 818-29. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01732-2
|
[51] |
Lan LJ, Zhang SM, Xu TT, et al. Prospective comparison of 68Ga-FAPI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging in biliary tract cancers[J]. Radiology, 2022, 304(3): 648-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213118
|
[52] |
Gündoğan C, Kömek H, Can CN, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2022, 43(1): 64-72. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001489
|
[53] |
Lin R, Lin ZF, Chen ZY, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with 18FDG PET/CT[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2022, 49(8): 2960-71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05799-5
|
[54] |
Zhang SM, Wang W, Xu TT, et al. Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging of gastric cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 925100. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925100
|
[55] |
Zheng S, Lin R, Chen SM, et al. Characterization of the benign lesions with increased 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in PET/CT[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2021, 35(12): 1312-20. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01673-w
|
[56] |
Qin CX, Song Y, Liu X, et al. Increased uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in bones and joints: metastases and beyond[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 49(2): 709-20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05472-3
|