CT quantitative parameters and imaging features of pulmonary microinvasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma
-
摘要:
目的 目的分析肺微浸润腺癌（MIA）和浸润性腺癌（IAC）的CT定量参数及影像学特征的鉴别诊断价值。 方法 选取2019年1月~2021年8月本院收治的80例肺腺癌患者为研究对象，根据病理结果分为MIA组（n=36）和IAC组（n=44），分析两组患者的CT征象，并采用受试者工作特征曲线（ROC）评估肺窗最大径、肺窗最大径的垂直径、肺窗病灶体积、肺窗平均CT值、纵膈窗最大径、纵膈窗最大径的垂直径、纵膈窗病灶体积、肿瘤影消失率指标鉴别IAC和MIA的敏感度和特异性。 结果 IAC组和MIA组CT影像中的病变位置、病灶形态、空泡征、肺瘤界面差异无统计学意义（P >0.05）；胸膜凹陷症、毛刺征、分叶征、血管集束征、支气管充气征差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）；IAC组肺窗最大径、肺窗最大径的垂直径、肺窗病灶体积、纵膈窗最大径、纵膈窗最大径的垂直径、纵膈窗病灶体积均高于MIA组（P < 0.05），肺窗平均CT值和肿瘤影消失率低于MIA组（P < 0.05）；ROC曲线显示，CT定量参数中鉴别诊断价值最高的是纵膈窗病灶体积，然后依次是纵膈窗最大径、肿瘤影消失率、肺窗病灶体积、肺窗最大径的垂直径、纵膈窗最大径的垂直径、肺窗平均CT值、肺窗最大径。 结论 当病灶影像学特征具有胸膜凹陷症、毛刺征、分叶征、血管集束征、支气管充气征时，IAC的可能性大，纵膈窗病灶体积和纵膈窗最大径鉴别IAC和MIA价值较大。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the diagnostic value on imaging features and CT quantitative parameters of pulmonary microinfiltrating adenocarcinoma (MIA) and infiltrating adenocarcinoma (IAC). Methods Eighty patients with lung adenocarcinoma admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as the study subjects. According to pathology, they were divided into MIA group (n=36) and IAC group (n=44). The CT signs of the two groups were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of lung window maximum diameter, vertical diameter of lung window maximum diameter, lung window lesion volume, lung window average CT value, mediastinal window maximum diameter, vertical diameter of mediastinal window maximum diameter, mediastinal window lesion volume, TDR indicators in the identification of IAC and MIA. Results There were no significant differences in lesion location, lesion morphology, vacuolar sign and lung tumor interface in the CT images of the IAC MIA group (P >0.05). There were significant differences in pleural depression, burr sign, lobulation sign, vascular cluster sign and bronchial inflation sign (P < 0.05). The maximum diameter of lung window, vertical diameter of maximum diameter of lung window, volume of lung window lesion, maximum diameter of mediastinal window, vertical diameter of maximum diameter of mediastinal window and lesion volume of mediastinal window in IAC group were significantly higher than those in MIA group (P < 0.05), and the mean CT value of the lung window and the disappearance rate of the tumor shadow were significantly lower than those in the MIA group (P < 0.05). ROC curve showed that the highest differential diagnostic value among the CT quantitative parameters was the volume of the mediastinal window lesion, followed by the maximum diameter of the mediastinal window, the disappearance rate of the tumor shadow, the vertical diameter of the maximum diameter of the lung window, the vertical diameter of the lung window, and the maximum diameter of the lung window. Conclusion When the imaging features of the lesion have pleural indentation, burr sign, lobulation sign, vascular cluster sign and bronchial inflatation sign, the possibility of IAC and mediastinal window lesion volume and mediastinal window maximum diameter are of great value in differentiating IAC from MIA. -
图 1 IAC和MIA影像学特征
A：IAC，右肺下叶上段见混杂磨玻璃密度结节，直径约2.2 cm，期内可见实性成分，边缘毛刺征象，形态不规则；B：MIA，右肺中叶磨玻璃密度结节，密度欠均匀，直径约1.2 cm，形态趋于类圆形，边界部分不清.
Figure 1. Imaging features of IAC and MIA.
图 2 CT定量参数对IAC和MIA鉴别诊断的ROC曲线
Figure 2. ROC curve of CT quantitative parameters for differential diagnosis of IAC and MIA.
表 1 两组一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general data between the two groups
[n(%)] 一般资料 IAC组（n=44） MIA组（n=36） t/ χ2 P 性别 0.205 0.651 男 31（70.45） 27（75.00） 女 13（29.55） 9（25.00） 年龄（岁, Mean±SD) 54.97±10.26 55.72±10.74 0.319 0.751 吸烟 16（36.36） 10（27.78） 0.665 0.415 并发症 8（18.18） 5（13.89） 0.268 0.605 手术方式 0.730 0.694 肺叶切除 25（56.82） 22（61.11） 肺段切除 8（18.18） 10（27.78） 楔形切除 11（25.00） 14（38.89） 家族肺癌史 6（13.64） 7（19.44） 0.491 0.484 IAC：浸润性腺癌；MIA：微浸润腺癌. 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 IAC组和MIA组影像学特征比较
Table 2. Comparison of imaging characteristics between IAC group and MIA group
[n(%)] 项目 IAC组（n=44） MIA组（n=36） χ2 P 病变位置 1.142 0.887 右肺上叶 13（29.55） 10（27.78） 右肺中叶 7（15.91） 6（16.67） 右肺下叶 9（20.45） 6（16.67） 左肺上叶 10（22.73） 7（19.44） 左肺下叶 （11.36） 7（19.44） 病灶形态 0.485 0.486 圆形/类圆形 15（34.09） 15（41.67） 不规则形 29（65.91） 21（58.33） 空泡征 13（29.55） 7（19.44） 1.077 0.299 胸膜凹陷症 12（27.27） 3（8.33） 4.662 0.031 毛刺征 15（34.09） 5（13.89） 4.310 0.038 分叶征 27（61.36） 13（36.11） 5.051 0.025 血管集束征 23（52.27） 10（27.78） 4.902 0.027 支气管充气征 20（45.45） 7（19.44） 5.991 0.014 肺瘤界面 0.131 0.718 清楚 19（43.18 17（47.22） 不清楚 25（56.82） 19（52.78）
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 IAC组和MIA组CT定量参数水平比较
Table 3. Comparison of CT quantitative parameters between IAC group and MIA group
(Mean±SD) 指标 截点值 AUC 敏感度（%） 特异性（%） 95%CI 肺窗最大径 2.35 0.644 52.27 80.56 0.529~0.748 肺窗最大径的垂直径 1.67 0.747 70.45 77.78 0.637~0.837 肺窗病灶体积 5.83 0.754 59.09 88.89 0.645~0.843 肺窗平均CT值 -509.64 0.648 79.55 52.78 0.534~0.752 纵膈窗最大径 1.27 0.786 75.00 77.78 0.680~0.870 纵膈窗最大径的垂直径 1.15 0.719 45.45 97.22 0.608~0.814 纵膈窗病灶体积 0.98 0.788 65.91 88.89 0.682~0.871 TDR 0.04 0.779 70.45 94.44 0.672~0.864 TDR：肿瘤影消失率.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 CT定量参数对IAC和MIA鉴别诊断价值分析
Table 4. Value analysis of CT quantitative parameters for differential diagnosis of IAC and MIA
参数 IAC组（n=44） MIA组（n=36） t P 肺窗最大径 2.44±0.82 1.98±0.61 2.792 0.007 肺窗最大径的垂直径 1.92±0.68 1.40±0.48 3.866 < 0.001 肺窗病灶体积 7.11±3.86 3.83±1.76 4.710 < 0.001 肺窗平均CT值 -444.42±79.83 492.73±104.18 2.348 0.021 纵膈窗最大径 1.77±0.86 0.94±0.56 4.987 < 0.001 纵膈窗最大径的垂直径 1.15±0.62 0.72±0.29 3.829 < 0.001 纵膈窗病灶体积 1.25±0.54 0.79±0.21 4.817 < 0.001 TDR -0.65±1.51 0.67±0.43 5.074 < 0.001
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 章永. 正念认知行为训练对肺癌患者自我感受负担、应对方式及自我效能的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(3): 359-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201903011.htm [2] Xie Y, Xue CY, Guo S, et al. microRNA-520a suppresses pathogenesis and progression of non-small-cell lung cancer through targeting the RRM2/wnt axis[J]. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst), 2021, 7: 1-12. [3] Wu KH, House L, Liu WQ, et al. Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13(9): 11471-96. doi: 10.3390/ijms130911471 [4] Peng Z, Pan LF, Niu ZQ, et al. Identification of microRNAs as potential biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma using integrating genomics analysis[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(38): 64143-56. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19358 [5] Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2011, 6(2): 244-85. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221 [6] Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2015, 10(7): 990-1003. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000559 [7] Liu SL, Wang R, Zhang Y, et al. Precise diagnosis of intraoperative frozen section is an effective method to guide resection strategy for peripheral small-sized lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(4): 307-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4907 [8] 虞梁, 王俊, 李洪, 等. 肺磨玻璃结节CT影像征象鉴别诊断肺浸润性腺癌与微浸润腺癌[J]. 南京医科大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 40 (2): 248-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJYK202002019.htm [9] 文康彦, 叶文钦, 张子钦, 等. 表现为单纯磨玻璃密度结节的肺浸润性腺癌的影像学特征分析[J]. 中国医学创新, 2018, 15(14): 87-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCX201814024.htm [10] 朱雄增. 重视肺腺癌诊治中的病理学研究[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2012, 41(10): 649-51. [11] Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH, et al. Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan [J]. Chest, 2013, 143(1): 172-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2501 [12] 左玉强, 冯平勇, 孟庆春, 等. 肺纯磨玻璃结节微浸润腺癌与浸润性腺癌的CT鉴别诊断[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2017, 36(4): 495-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFS201704013.htm [13] Yue JY, Chen J, Zhou FM, et al. CT-pathologic correlation in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(50): e13362. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013362 [14] 李月月, 罗学毛, 张鑫, 等. 磨玻璃结节样多灶性肺腺癌CT征象与病理对照[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(1): 60-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXX201801022.htm [15] 卢涛, 陈韵彬, 刘向一. 肺磨玻璃结节的HRCT征象及病理分期对比分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2017, 15(7): 40-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR201707013.htm [16] 杨长德, 龚洪翰, 陈金花, 等. 肺恶性局灶单纯性磨玻璃密度结节的CT表现[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2012, 28(9): 1354-8. [17] 张海健. 探讨肺部磨玻璃结节的HRCT征象及其病理分期的关系[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2018, 2(22): 180-1. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYY201822120.htm [18] Yan JG, Wang HP, Zhou HW, et al. Correlation between expression of Ki-67 and MSCT signs in different types of lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(2): e18678. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018678 [19] 任开明, 赵俊刚, 林爱军, 等. 肺磨玻璃结节的CT影像特征与病理分类的对照分析研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2019, 30(8): 558-61, 577. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYYX201908010.htm [20] Li Q, Li X, Li XY, et al. Histological subtypes of solid-dominant invasive lung adenocarcinoma: differentiation using dual-energy spectral CT[J]. Clin Radiol, 2021, 76(1): 77. e1-77. e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.034 [21] Zhao Q, Wang JW, Yang L, et al. CT diagnosis of pleural and stromal invasion in malignant subpleural pure ground-glass nodules: an exploratory study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(1): 279-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5558-0 [22] Liu LH, Liu M, Wei R, et al. CT findings of persistent pure ground glass opacity: can we predict the invasiveness?[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015, 16(5): 1925-8. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.5.1925 [23] Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY, et al. Pure ground-glass opacity on chest computed tomography: predictive factors for invasive adenocarcinoma[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(7): 1561-70. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.34 [24] 花荣, 胡金秀, 薛蔚佳, 等. 低剂量胸部CT与癌胚抗原、Cyfra21-1水平在早期肺癌检查中的价值[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2021, 44(5): 830- 4. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2021.05.19 [25] 韩丽珠, 叶兆祥, 李绪斌, 等. CT定量参数预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的临床价值[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(6): 286-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZL201806004.htm [26] Eguchi T, Yoshizawa A, Kawakami S, et al. Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(5): e97867 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097867 -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1395
- HTML全文浏览量: 476
- PDF下载量: 26
- 被引次数: 0
