Diagnostic value of pelvic magnetic resonance plain scan, GD-DTPA enhanced scan and DWI on patients with pelvic abscess: a prospective study of sixty-four patients
-
摘要:
目的探讨盆腔MRI平扫、钆喷酸葡胺增强扫描及扩散加权成像(DWI)对盆腔脓肿患者的诊断效能。 方法选择2018年1月~2019年6月收治的64例拟诊为盆腔脓肿的患者作为研究对象,全部患者均经MRI平扫、增强扫描及DWI检查。以活检或手术病理作为金标准,评估MRI平扫、增强扫描及DWI检查诊断盆腔脓肿的结果,并比较各检查方法的效能指标(灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值),绘制ROC曲线比较各检查方法诊断曲线下面积,观察盆腔脓肿的MRI表现。 结果增强扫描、DWI敏感度、特异度和准确率与MRI平扫对比差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);增强扫描与DWI敏感度、特异度和准确率对比差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。DWI和增强扫描ROC曲线下面积高于MRI平扫(P < 0.05),增强扫描与DWI的曲线下面积对比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。MRI平扫准确诊断39例,多数为囊实性包块、形态不规则、边界清晰、可见包膜、有明显分隔;T1WI序列显示包块总体呈低信号,T2WI序列显示包块呈不均匀的高信号和稍高信号。DWI检查显示多数病灶呈高信号,低ADC值,扩散明显受限。增强扫描显示多数病灶表现为渐进性强化,部分病灶分隔壁出现不同程度的强化。 结论盆腔MRI、钆喷酸葡胺增强扫描及DWI诊断盆腔脓肿均效能良好,其中增强扫描效能最高。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the diagnostic efficacy of pelvic MRI plain scan, gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced scan and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on patients with pelvic abscess. MethodsSixty-four patients with possible pelvic abscess who were admitted from January 2018 to June 2019 were selected. All patients underwent MRI plain scan, enhanced scan and DWI. The biopsy or surgical pathology was used as the gold standard, and the results of MRI plain scan, enhanced scan and DWI examination were evaluated in the diagnosis of pelvic abscess. The efficacy indicators (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of each examination method were compared. ROC curve was drawn to compare the AUC of each examination method, and the MRI findings of pelvic abscess were observed. ResultsThe differences in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate between enhanced scan and DWI compared with those of MRI plain scan were not significant (P > 0.05). The differences in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate between enhanced scan and DWI were not significant (P > 0.05). The AUC value of ROC of DWI and enhanced scan was higher than that of MRI plain scan (P < 0.05). The difference of the AUC between enhanced scan and DWI was not significant (P > 0.05). MRI plain scan accurately diagnosed 39 cases, most of which were cystic solid masses, with irregular shape, clear boundary, visible capsule and obvious separation. T1WI sequence showed that the masses were mostly with low signal, and T2WI sequence showed the masses were with uneven high signal and slightly higher signal. DWI examination showed that most lesions were with high signal, low ADC value and obviously limited diffusion. Enhanced scan showed that most lesions showed progressive enhancement and some lesions showed different degrees of enhancement on the dividing wall. ConclusionPelvic MRI, gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced scan and DWI all have good efficacy in the diagnosis of pelvic abscess. The enhanced scan has the highest efficacy. -
表 1 各检查方法诊断盆腔脓肿的结果
Table 1. Results of various examination methods in the diagnosis of pelvic abscess
检杳结果 MRI平扫 DWI 增强扫描 脓肿 非脓肿 脓肿 非脓肿 脓肿 非脓肿 盆腔脓肿(n=43) 39 4 41 2 41 2 非盆腔脓肿(n=21) 5 16 2 19 1 20 合计 44 20 43 21 42 22 DWI: diffusion weighted imaging. 表 2 各检查方法诊断盆腔脓肿的效能(%)
Table 2. Efficacy of various examination methods in the diagnosis of pelvic abscess
检杳方法 灵敏度 特异度 准确率 阳性预测值 阴性预测值 MRI平扫 90.70 76.19 85.94 88.64 80.00 DWI 95.35 90.48 93.75 95.35 90.48 增强扫描 95.35 95.24 95.31 97.62 90.91 表 3 各检查方法诊断盆腔脓肿的ROC曲线
Table 3. ROC curves of various examination methods in the diagnosis of pelvic abscess
检查方法 AUC 95%CI MRI平扫 0.834 0.715-0.954 DWI 0.929* 0.821-1.000 增强扫描 0.953* 0.839-1.000 *P < 0.05 vs MRI平扫. -
[1] 张瑞, 陈施, 刘朝晖.化脓性盆腔炎(盆腔脓肿)25例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志, 2018, 19(3): 226-8. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgfcklczz201803012 [2] 殷欣, 卞广玉, 王德莹, 等.盆腔脓肿的诊疗进展[J].中国医师杂志, 2019, 21(2): 309-11. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgyszz201902048 [3] 王皓, 叶红, 刘颖, 等.降钙素原在评估盆腔脓肿患者病情及预后的研究[J].中国临床医生杂志, 2019, 47(8): 972-5. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zglcys201908031 [4] 张岱.盆腔炎的诊治进展[J].临床药物治疗杂志, 2019, 17(12): 36-9, 69. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgysyy201405021 [5] 冉青, 王华, 甄艳华, 等.术后盆腔感染诊断中超声的应用分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(14): 3292-5. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhyygrxzz201714046 [6] 郭小飞, 刘燕娜, 杨顺实.超声诊断中老年女性盆腔囊实性肿物的应用价值[J].中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(15): 3659-61. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zglnxzz201915020 [7] 马财, 陈文静, 徐蕊, 等.磁共振与超声诊断女性盆腔囊性病变价值与优势[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(3): 85-7. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcthmrizz201803027 [8] 焦志云, 胡春洪, 杜芳, 等.磁共振动态增强联合多b值扩散加权成像鉴别诊断肺部良恶性病变的价值[J].临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 239-43. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lcfsxzz201902011 [9] 骆众星, 李萌, 蔡华崧, 等.磁共振动态增强和弥散加权成像在颅内感染诊断中的应用价值[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(16): 2463-7, 2477. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhyygrxzz201916015 [10] 韦骏, 马强华, 叶建军, 等.磁共振DWI结合常规MRI对腹盆腔脓肿的诊断价值[J].放射学实践, 2009, 24(4): 418-21. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fsxsj200904020 [11] 王煜晅, 胡爱妹, 骆伟仙, 等.女性盆腔囊性病变的MRI诊断与鉴别诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志, 2008, 18(7): 783-5. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yxyxxzz200807026 [12] 赵鑫福, 任振东, 王利艳, 等.女性盆腔囊性和囊实性病变的MRI诊断[J].实用放射学杂志, 2015, 31(4): 689-91. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syfsxzz201504047 [13] 张展, 刘朝晖.盆腔炎性疾病的诊治进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(4): 473-7. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgysyy201405021 [14] 中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组.盆腔炎症性疾病诊治规范(2019修订版)[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2019, 54(7): 433-7. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhfck201907001 [15] 刘情, 王国锋, 谢铁明. MR-DWI及表观弥散系数值对卵巢肿瘤临床诊断的应用研究[J].中华内分泌外科杂志, 2018, 12(2): 154-7. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nfmwk201802016 [16] 彭旭红, 杨栋梁, 雷苑麟, 等.阳性亲淋巴对比剂增强MR淋巴造影对淋巴结成像的实验验证[J].分子影像学杂志, 2019, 42(4): 461-4. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2019.04.09 [17] 李炳荣, 肖扬锐, 罗项超, 等.肝内胆管细胞癌与不典型肝脓肿的MRI鉴别诊断[J].中华放射学杂志, 2019, 53(5): 370-4. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhfsx201905009 [18] 孔鹏, 孟令平, 杨斌, 等.不同b值DWI在卵巢良恶性囊实性病变中的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志, 2017, 33(6): 587-90, 610. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syfsxzz201706019 [19] 谢万猛. MRI对女性盆腔占位性疾病诊断价值分析[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2017, 15(12): 106-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcthmrizz201712033 [20] 郑桦, 符孔, 李传资, 等. DWI和DCE-MRI鉴别不同乳腺炎性疾病类型的价值研究[J].河北医药, 2018, 40(21): 3237-40. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbyy201821008 [21] 雷维民, 韩瑞, 张东友.输卵管卵巢脓肿影像学表现及误诊分析[J].实用放射学杂志, 2017, 33(2): 251-3. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syfsxzz201702027 [22] 孙海珠, 刘晶晶, 路莉, 等.细菌潜生体与盆腔脓肿发病相关性研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2017, 33(3): 319-23. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsyfkyckzz201703020 [23] 倪臣美, 杜桂枝, 王国华, 等.儿童阑尾炎术后腹盆腔脓肿的DWI诊断价值浅析[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2019, 25(3): 286-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyxjsjcx201903015 [24] 孙静, 王铸.磁共振弥散加权成像在食管癌中的应用研究进展[J].癌症进展, 2019, 17(14): 1627-9, 1646. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/azjz201914004 [25] 张丽君, 邢伟, 邢士军. 3.0 T磁共振扩散峰度成像联合扩散加权成像评估侵袭性前列腺癌[J].分子影像学杂志, 2020, 43(1): 76-81. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2020.01.16 [26] 蔡凯丽, 赵继泉, 张穗诚, 等. MRI及CT在妇科盆腔脓肿诊断及分期中的研究进展[J].罕少疾病杂志, 2018, 25(6): 86-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hsjbzz201806033